RabbitMQ vs. Spotfire Streaming

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
RabbitMQ
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
RabbitMQ, an open source message broker, is part of Pivotal Software, a VMware company acquired in 2019, and supports message queue, multiple messaging protocols, and more. RabbitMQ is available open source, however VMware also offers a range of commercial services for RabbitMQ; these are available as part of the Pivotal App Suite.N/A
Spotfire Streaming
Score 5.1 out of 10
N/A
The Spotfire Streaming (formerly TIBCO Streaming or StreamBase) platform is a high-performance system for rapidly building applications that analyze and act on real-time streaming data. Using Spotfire Streaming, users can rapidly build real-time systems and deploy them at a fraction of the cost and risk of other alternatives.N/A
Pricing
RabbitMQSpotfire Streaming
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
RabbitMQSpotfire Streaming
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
RabbitMQSpotfire Streaming
Features
RabbitMQSpotfire Streaming
Streaming Analytics
Comparison of Streaming Analytics features of Product A and Product B
RabbitMQ
-
Ratings
Spotfire Streaming
8.3
2 Ratings
4% above category average
Real-Time Data Analysis00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Visualization Dashboards00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Data Ingestion from Multiple Data Sources00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Low Latency00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Integrated Development Tools00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Data wrangling and preparation00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Machine Learning Automation00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
RabbitMQSpotfire Streaming
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

IBM Streams (discontinued)
IBM Streams (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 8.7 out of 10
Confluent
Confluent
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 8.7 out of 10
IBM Streams (discontinued)
IBM Streams (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
RabbitMQSpotfire Streaming
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(11 ratings)
5.2
(15 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
6.5
(4 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
RabbitMQSpotfire Streaming
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
It is highly recommended that if you have microservices architecture and if you want to solve 2 phase commit issue, you should use RabbitMQ for communication between microservices. It is a quick and reliable mode of communication between microservices. It is also helpful if you want to implement a job and worker mechanism. You can push the jobs into RabbitMQ and that will be sent to the consumer. It is highly reliable so you won't miss any jobs and you can also implement a retry of jobs with the dead letter queue feature. It will be also helpful in time-consuming API. You can put time-consuming items into a queue so they will be processed later and your API will be quick.
Read full review
Spotfire
Taking data from various sources including files, databases, web services, applying some complex rules, transforming, aggregating and producing a result. This is what Spotfire Streaming does best.
- If one needs connectivity to special services as secured databases or web services, building interactive web apps, those are probably tasks that shall be addressed with different tools.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • What RabbitMQ does well is what it's advertised to do. It is good at providing lots of high volume, high availability queue. We've seen it handle upwards of 10 million messages in its queues, spread out over 200 queues before its publish/consume rates dipped. So yeah, it can definitely handle a lot of messages and a lot of queues. Depending on the size of the machine RabbitMQ is running on, I'm sure it can handle more.
  • Decent number of plugins! Want a plugin that gives you an interface to view all the queues and see their publish/consume rates? Yes, there's one for that. Want a plugin to "shovel" messages from one queue to another in an emergency? Check. Want a plugin that does extra logging for all the messages received? Got you covered!
  • Lots of configuration possibilities. We've tuned over 100 settings over the past year to get the performance and reliability just right. This could be a downside though--it's pretty confusing and some settings were hard to understand.
Read full review
Spotfire
  • Processing events in real-time with real low latency and high throughput.
  • 100% visual program language, which can be extended by common languages like Java, Python and .NET.
  • Reduced time to prototype, create an application and deployment, which reduces the software lifecycle.
  • Real robust engine and server. Barely heard of customers having issues in production.
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • It breaks communication if we don't acknowledge early. In some cases our work items are time consuming that will take a time and in that scenario we are getting errors that RabbitMQ broke the channel. It will be good if RabbitMQ provides two acknowledgements, one is for that it has been received at client side and second ack is client is completed the processing part.
Read full review
Spotfire
  • Being a niche tool, there's not much community support
  • It is on prem, making it slow to boot. not cloud native (It could be that it is our org's issue)
  • The dev environment is very tough to understand for large projects due to the wire style UI/UX
Read full review
Usability
Open Source
RabbitMQ is very easy to configure for all supported languages (Python, Java, etc.). I have personally used it on Raspberry Pi devices via a Flask Python API as well as in Java applications. I was able to learn it quickly and now have full mastery of it. I highly recommend it for any IoT project.
Read full review
Spotfire
The usability is good in terms that it gets well integrated with the Spotfire suite but the only few issues I have is the tough UI/UX (learning curve, if the project is huge) and unable to find many users and devs to help with the queries. At the end it is solely based on the documentation provided which is never enough
Read full review
Support Rating
Open Source
I gave it a 10 but we do not have a support contract with any company for RabbitMQ so there is no official support in that regard. However, there is a community and questions asked on StackOverflow or any other major question and answer site will usually get a response.
Read full review
Spotfire
Spotfire Streaming support is prompt and to the point. They help with best practices and learning from existing projects.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
RabbitMQ has a few advantages over Azure Service Bus 1) RMQ handles substantially larger files - ASB tops out at 100MB, we use RabbitMQfor files over 200MB 2) RabbitMQ can be easily setup on prem - Azure Service Bus is cloud only 3) RabbitMQ exchanges are easier to configure over ASB subscriptions ASB has a few advantages too 1) Cloud based - just a few mouse clicks and you're up and running
Read full review
Spotfire
We are using Dataflow (by Google).The development time in Spotfire Streaming is definitely shorter because its GUI based. Dataflow handles late arrivals after the window closes, not sure Spotfire Streaming can do that. Dataflow can run GCP as a managed service which is why we chose that tool for our new product.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Positive: we don't need to keep way too many backend machines around to deal with bursts because RabbitMQ can absorb and buffer bursts long enough to let an understaffed set of backend services to catch up on processing. Hard to put a number to it but we probably save $5k a month having fewer machines around.
  • Negative: we've got many angry customers due to queues suddenly disappearing and dropping our messages when we try to publish to them afterward. Ideally, RabbitMQ should warn the user when queues expire due to inactivity but it doesn't, and due to our own bugs we've lost a lot of customer data as a result.
  • Positive: makes decoupling the web and API services from the deeper backend services easier by providing queues as an interface. This allowed us to split up our teams and have them develop independently of each other, speeding up software development.
Read full review
Spotfire
  • While we haven't specifically integrated Spotfire Streaming into our product development, it has allowed us to see the benefits of real-time streaming data.
  • We have much more visibility into how our longer term roadmap will look and what we should focus on.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Spotfire Streaming Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of