What users are saying about

RavenDB vs Voldemort

RavenDB
10 Ratings
Voldemort
This review does not include a rating.

RavenDB

10 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.9 out of 100

Based on 10 reviews and ratings

Voldemort

This review does not include a rating.

Likelihood to Recommend

RavenDB

It worked quite well as a centralized location for data from different existing sources with fast data loading into it with a generous free tier to get a good understanding of how to use it. Although it was kind of clunky getting it to work on Linux due to the certificates required.The clients for languages like python and NodeJS exist but are a little under documented — although the C# one was rather good.

Read full review

Holger Harzer | TrustRadius Reviewer
Holger Harzer
View all 9 answers on this topic

Voldemort

No answers on this topic

Feature Rating Comparison

NoSQL Databases

RavenDB
9.0
Voldemort
—
Performance
RavenDB
9.1
Voldemort
—
Availability
RavenDB
9.0
Voldemort
—
Concurrency
RavenDB
8.8
Voldemort
—
Security
RavenDB
9.0
Voldemort
—
Scalability
RavenDB
8.9
Voldemort
—
Data model flexibility
RavenDB
9.1
Voldemort
—
Deployment model flexibility
RavenDB
8.8
Voldemort
—

Pros

RavenDB

  • Cool clustering with modest features
  • Fabulous auto indexing
  • Great studio and dashboard
  • Detailed documentation
  • Attachments on the document
  • Outstanding revisions
  • Easy ETL
  • Low prices on the clouds
  • Multi model support
  • Advance search
  • Informative webinars

Read full review

Sina Zaimaran | TrustRadius Reviewer
Sina Zaimaran
View all 9 answers on this topic

Voldemort

No answers on this topic

Cons

RavenDB

  • In previous versions the documentation was terrible - however, since v4.0 the documentation is excellent.
  • Any minor complaints are generally resolved by the team the same day. I suggested at one time some minor tweaks to Studio (showing the number of items in an array) and they were implemented almost immediately.
  • Nothing really to complain about.

Read full review

Jeremy Holt | TrustRadius Reviewer
Jeremy Holt
View all 9 answers on this topic

Voldemort

No answers on this topic

Likelihood to Renew

RavenDB

RavenDB 9.5
Based on 5 answers
We've had an excellent experience using RavenDB. Internally we are testing the newer features in 5.0 such as time series, which will effect the con specified previously dependent on the real world performance. We foresee that BattleCrate will continue to use RavenDB as we grow.

Read full review

Alan Doherty | TrustRadius Reviewer
Alan Doherty
View all 5 answers on this topic

Voldemort

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Usability

RavenDB

RavenDB 8.4
Based on 5 answers
RavenDb does all the heavy lifting for you in 99% of cases. The API is easy to work with and lets you write very readable code. There is a small learning curve at the start but this is true for any tech. Raven's curve is easy to get over.

Read full review

Chris Llewellyn | TrustRadius Reviewer
Chris Llewellyn
View all 5 answers on this topic

Voldemort

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Support Rating

RavenDB

RavenDB 9.0
Based on 6 answers
Very good support that answered fast, nice and reliably. The problems were always resolved quickly and competently, even if the user was the problem. If any unusual issues arose, the support was proactive in contacting me to resolve problems or roadblocks I might have had.

Read full review

Holger Harzer | TrustRadius Reviewer
Holger Harzer
View all 6 answers on this topic

Voldemort

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Implementation Rating

RavenDB

RavenDB 7.3
Based on 1 answer
RavenFS changed along the way and made us change the codes.

Read full review

Sina Zaimaran | TrustRadius Reviewer
Sina Zaimaran
View all 1 answers on this topic

Voldemort

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

RavenDB

When I first started using RavenDB, I did evaluate Mongo DB but found it to be lacking. The primary issue was that Mongo DB did not support atomic consistency for the persistence of multiple documents at the same time, although I think this may not be an issue with subsequent releases of Mongo DB. If for some reason I were forced to select an alternative Document Database, I would probably evaluate PostgreSQL or CosmosDB.

Read full review

Adam Nemitoff | TrustRadius Reviewer
Adam Nemitoff
View all 9 answers on this topic

Voldemort

No answers on this topic

Return on Investment

RavenDB

  • Not having to debug perf issues caused by ORM.
  • Not having to deal with SQL as you denormalize your app data model.

Read full review

Wallace Turner | TrustRadius Reviewer
Wallace Turner
View all 9 answers on this topic

Voldemort

No answers on this topic

Pricing Details

RavenDB

General

Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Voldemort

General

Free Trial
—
Free/Freemium Version
—
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
—
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Rating Summary

Likelihood to Recommend

RavenDB
8.9
Voldemort
—

Likelihood to Renew

RavenDB
9.5
Voldemort
—

Usability

RavenDB
8.4
Voldemort
—

Support Rating

RavenDB
9.0
Voldemort
—

Implementation Rating

RavenDB
7.3
Voldemort
—

Add comparison