Rchilli vs. Tribepad Applicant Tracking Software

This is a great tool if you need to imbed the functionality (as we have done). Perhaps not a well suited to standalone use.

Highly recommended as a fairly priced, feature-rich ATS with plenty of customization and flexibility in a modular approach. Is it simple to use and an engaging platform. The support team is great!

• Parsing of Candidate Resumes with good accuracy
• Around 70 to 80 different Candidate Fields
• Supports Individual, Bulk Online and Offline Parsing

• Customise
• Support
• Flexibility

• So far, we have nothing to complain about.

• Reporting
• Design
• Workflows

We helped redesign the interface that best suits our brand. Tribepad is a great partner for us. They listen carefully to our requirements and we work collaboratively to solve challenges and build a better evolving product and experience.

The support is great. Tribepad is a very customer-oriented business that thrives on delivering and supporting its customers.

We recently evaluated Azure Cognitive AI Services. It was not economical and we were asked to partner with another partner of Microsoft for specific Resume Parsing Services. Looking at the cost benefits, efficiency of parsing and ease of use of RChilli, we decided to continue with our very good partner RChilli

More cost-effective, better product, flexible, customizable, integrates well with other platforms and its UX/UI is more advanced and simple

• Using Rchilli saved us thousands of dollars in development costs and avoided on-going maintenance.
• Using their taxonomy's means we don't have to maintain our own, saving us time and subscription costs.

• Positive impact to spending less time recruiting by automating
• Positive impact to cost savings compared with other vendors
• Positive impact to design and usability to engage with users