Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. Serverless360
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ansible | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it. | $5,000 per year |
Serverless360 | Score10 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Serverless360 is a platform to manage and monitor Azure Serverless components related to enterprise integration. In a real-time scenario, the integrated cloud applications are not built with a single technology stack, it typically involves at least 3 or 4 different Azure Services. Currently, Azure Portal is designed more on vertical technology silos and it's difficult to visualize and manage such connected solutions. So Serverless360 is presented by the vendor as a tool that users can depend on… | N/A |
| Ansible | Serverless360 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Ansible | Serverless360 | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
99% Would buy again 265 Answers | 100% Would buy again 7 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
96% Delivers good value for the price 210 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
98% Happy with the feature set 263 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 166 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
89% Implementation went as expected 201 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | |
| Ansible | Serverless360 | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Ansible | Serverless360 | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Salt Score6.2 out of 10 | Rackspace Fabric Score6.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Perforce Puppet Score8.5 out of 10 | IBM Turbonomic Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Salt Score6.2 out of 10 | IBM Turbonomic Score8.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Ansible | Serverless360 | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.8 | 10.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.2 | - |
| Usability | 8.3 | 10.0 |
| Performance | 8.7 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 8.6 | - |
| Ansible | Serverless360 | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Serverless360 Screenshots |










