Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Ansible
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it.
$5,000
per year
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Editions & Modules
Basic Tower
5,000
per year
Enterprise Tower
10,000
per year
Premium Tower
14,000
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ansible
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Considered Both Products
Ansible
Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Identity Manager focuses on authentication and account management, while Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform focuses on IT automation and system management. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was selected because it supports scalable automation, reduces manual administration, …
Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
We prefer Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's scalability and human friendly coding to the more developer heavy platforms.
Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a better orchestration tool for large organizations and replaced our Chef cookbooks
Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Satellite, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, and RHEL are a great suite of products to use together. They all help bring the best out of the other.
Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Is really helpfull with the hardening and configurations deploy.
Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Our org was using puppet and burning too many people-hours just touching the scripts, troubleshooting, and maintaining why changes were made. Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform as it was much easier to code and follow.
Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
One of these is already included in our license and the other is not. The agent based model makes access management to servers simpler. The agentless model makes things more flexible and secure for large organizations
Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
We selected Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because the Redhat support
Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform simplicity was the best part
Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
The way its structure it’s just way harder to find and if a script is modified it won’t tell you exactly who made the change or even if a change was made, when it runs it doesn’t tell you what happen and overall it’s really difficult to use compare to Red Hat Ansible Automation …
Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Maintenance and Building openshift cluster
Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
We used CA Process Automation and replaced all functionality with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
In my opinion, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is Easier to use and better UI than competitors
Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Centralized control and execution.
Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Managing Puppet can be a full-time job in itself. It requires a client to be installed and managed on each host. If your infrastructure was designed with a certain version of Puppet, upgrading can be very difficult. Ansible is much easier to start using and can deliver value …
User Ratings
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(287 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.3
(8 ratings)
Usability
8.4
(179 ratings)
Performance
8.7
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(5 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.6
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat
I think it's the best defacto orchestrator for automation because it's so easy to integrate in other tools to it (dynatrace, cyberark, terraform, etc). It is a lot for a new or smaller team to use so I wouldn't recommend it to a new team using Ansible, in that case using Ansible navigator is a better start to understanding playbooks/inventories before diving into the complexity of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. EDA also takes a lot of connectivity between Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and target systems to get working which can be difficult in very locked down envs unless you have approval from many other teams like networking and security.
Read full review
Pros
Red Hat
  • Standardize controls and visibility for automation.
  • Provide RBAC and Vault for improved automation security and support.
  • Job Scheduling is much more effective than Cron or other home-grown solutions.
  • The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform API is one of the best features as it makes automation accessible from any other platform.
Read full review
Cons
Red Hat
  • Ansible is still not truly declarative like Terraform.
  • Simple automation is fine, but creating complex, scalable automation scripts is very difficult to learn.
  • For a higher number of nodes, Ansible consumes a lot of resources. It needs the paid version of AAP, which requires a cost.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Red Hat
We are extremely happy with the use of AAP. It's better than expected, There is almost no limit when thinking of automation. The only problem is that the day to day is consuming a big part of our time. Patching and checking vulnerabilities are virtually killing us. But we can only improve with AAP.
Read full review
Usability
Red Hat
Everything has room for improvement, but Ansible is the best tool out there for what it does and what it can do. There are plenty of features and capabilities that can be added, but it's just a matter of time before it happens.
Read full review
Performance
Red Hat
Great in almost every way compared to any other configuration management software. The only thing I wish for is python3 support. Other than that, YAML is much improved compared to the Ruby of Chef. The agentless nature is incredibly convenient for managing systems quickly, and if a member of your term has no terminal experience whatsoever they can still use the UI.
Read full review
Support Rating
Red Hat
There is a lot of good documentation that Ansible and Red Hat provide which should help get someone started with making Ansible useful. But once you get to more complicated scenarios, you will benefit from learning from others. I have not used Red Hat support for work with Ansible, but many of the online resources are helpful.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Red Hat
I spoke on this topic today!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Red Hat
AAP compares favorably with Terraform and Power Automate. I don't have much experience with Terraform, but I find AAP and Ansible easier to use as well as having more capabilities. Power Platform is also an excellent automation tool that is user friendly but I feel that Ansible has more compatibility with a variety of technologies.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Red Hat
  • First, it keeps our entire server infrastructure aligned with our standards and reduces the time and effort needed to maintain our systems.
  • Automate routine IT tasks to save time, reduce errors, and ensure every server is configured and updated consistently.
  • Tasks that used to take our teams weeks to complete manually now run automatically and reliably, with full visibility, making our infrastructure management more effective and our compliance tracking much easier.
Read full review
ScreenShots