TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Ansible

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AThe Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it.

    $5,000

    per year

    Pricing
    Ansible
    Editions & Modules
    Basic Tower
    5,000
    per year
    Enterprise Tower
    10,000
    per year
    Premium Tower
    14,000
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Ansible
    Free Trial
    No
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Ansible
    Considered Both Products
    Red Hat
    Chose Ansible
    HCL BigFix is also highly scalable product but it is for multi environment. It is not completely supported for Linux environment and to do any configuration on Linux level. Also if we wanted to create any policy or hardening, bigfix has limitation on full linux kernel and not …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Since Terraform is an infrastructure provisioning tool it does not have that much compatibility for configuration management tool. Also, Chef and salt stack are configuration management tool but does not have infrastructure provisioning capabilities good as compared to Red Hat …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Identity Manager focuses on authentication and account management, while Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform focuses on IT automation and system management. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was selected because it supports scalable automation, reduces manual administration, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    We prefer Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's scalability and human friendly coding to the more developer heavy platforms.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a better orchestration tool for large organizations and replaced our Chef cookbooks
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Satellite, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, and RHEL are a great suite of products to use together. They all help bring the best out of the other.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Is really helpfull with the hardening and configurations deploy.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Our org was using puppet and burning too many people-hours just touching the scripts, troubleshooting, and maintaining why changes were made. Chose Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform as it was much easier to code and follow.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    We selected Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because the Redhat support
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform simplicity was the best part
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    The way its structure it’s just way harder to find and if a script is modified it won’t tell you exactly who made the change or even if a change was made, when it runs it doesn’t tell you what happen and overall it’s really difficult to use compare to Red Hat Ansible Automation …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Maintenance and Building openshift cluster
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    We used CA Process Automation and replaced all functionality with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    In my opinion, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is Easier to use and better UI than competitors
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Centralized control and execution.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ansible
    Managing Puppet can be a full-time job in itself. It requires a client to be installed and managed on each host. If your infrastructure was designed with a certain version of Puppet, upgrading can be very difficult. Ansible is much easier to start using and can deliver value …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    99%
    Would buy again
    265 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    210 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    263 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    166 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    89%
    Implementation went as expected
    201 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    Ansible
    Small Businesses
    Salt
    Score6.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Perforce Puppet
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Salt
    Score6.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Ansible
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.8
    (292 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.2
    (8 ratings)
    Usability
    8.3
    (184 ratings)
    Performance
    8.7
    (5 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (5 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.6
    (5 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Ansible
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Red Hat
    I think it's the best defacto orchestrator for automation because it's so easy to integrate in other tools to it (dynatrace, cyberark, terraform, etc). It is a lot for a new or smaller team to use so I wouldn't recommend it to a new team using Ansible, in that case using Ansible navigator is a better start to understanding playbooks/inventories before diving into the complexity of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. EDA also takes a lot of connectivity between Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and target systems to get working which can be difficult in very locked down envs unless you have approval from many other teams like networking and security.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Red Hat
    • Standardize controls and visibility for automation.
    • Provide RBAC and Vault for improved automation security and support.
    • Job Scheduling is much more effective than Cron or other home-grown solutions.
    • The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform API is one of the best features as it makes automation accessible from any other platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Red Hat
    • Ansible is still not truly declarative like Terraform.
    • Simple automation is fine, but creating complex, scalable automation scripts is very difficult to learn.
    • For a higher number of nodes, Ansible consumes a lot of resources. It needs the paid version of AAP, which requires a cost.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Red Hat
    We are extremely happy with the use of AAP. It's better than expected, There is almost no limit when thinking of automation. The only problem is that the day to day is consuming a big part of our time. Patching and checking vulnerabilities are virtually killing us. But we can only improve with AAP.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Red Hat
    Everything has room for improvement, but Ansible is the best tool out there for what it does and what it can do. There are plenty of features and capabilities that can be added, but it's just a matter of time before it happens.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Red Hat
    Great in almost every way compared to any other configuration management software. The only thing I wish for is python3 support. Other than that, YAML is much improved compared to the Ruby of Chef. The agentless nature is incredibly convenient for managing systems quickly, and if a member of your term has no terminal experience whatsoever they can still use the UI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Red Hat
    There is a lot of good documentation that Ansible and Red Hat provide which should help get someone started with making Ansible useful. But once you get to more complicated scenarios, you will benefit from learning from others. I have not used Red Hat support for work with Ansible, but many of the online resources are helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Red Hat
    I spoke on this topic today!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Red Hat
    AAP compares favorably with Terraform and Power Automate. I don't have much experience with Terraform, but I find AAP and Ansible easier to use as well as having more capabilities. Power Platform is also an excellent automation tool that is user friendly but I feel that Ansible has more compatibility with a variety of technologies.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Red Hat
    • First, it keeps our entire server infrastructure aligned with our standards and reduces the time and effort needed to maintain our systems.
    • Automate routine IT tasks to save time, reduce errors, and ensure every server is configured and updated consistently.
    • Tasks that used to take our teams weeks to complete manually now run automatically and reliably, with full visibility, making our infrastructure management more effective and our compliance tracking much easier.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots