Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. Snyk
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ansible | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it. | $5,000 per year |
Snyk | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | Snyk’s Developer Security Platform automatically integrates with a developer’s workflow and helps security teams to collaborate with their development teams. It boasts a developer-first approach that ensures organizations can secure all of the critical components of their applications from code to cloud, driving developer productivity, revenue growth, customer satisfaction, cost savings and an improved security posture. The vendor states Snyk is used by 1,200 customers worldwide today, including… | $0 |
| Ansible | Snyk | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Pricing is dependent on the number of developers selected, the number of products selected, and the payment term selected. Please visit the Snyk plans page for an interactive pricing calculator. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Ansible | Snyk | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
99% Would buy again 265 Answers | 100% Would buy again 6 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
96% Delivers good value for the price 210 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
98% Happy with the feature set 263 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 166 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
89% Implementation went as expected 201 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Ansible | Snyk | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Salt Score6.2 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Perforce Puppet Score8.5 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Salt Score6.2 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Ansible | Snyk | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.2 | - |
| Usability | 8.3 | 9.0 |
| Performance | 8.7 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 8.6 | - |
| Ansible | Snyk | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |



