Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. Traefik
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ansible | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it. | $5,000 per year |
![]() Traefik | Score7 out of 10 | N/A | Traefik Labs in San Francisco develops cloud-native application networking software that helps developers and operations teams build, deploy and run modern microservices. Traefik Labs’ flagship solution, Traefik Enterprise, provides API management, ingress control and service mesh together with high availability, advanced security, autoscaling and dedicated support. | N/A |
| Ansible | Traefik | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Ansible | Traefik | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | ![]() No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
99% Would buy again 265 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
96% Delivers good value for the price 210 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
98% Happy with the feature set 263 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 166 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
89% Implementation went as expected 201 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Ansible | Traefik | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Salt Score6.2 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Perforce Puppet Score8.5 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Salt Score6.2 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Ansible | Traefik | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.8 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.2 | - |
| Usability | 8.3 | - |
| Performance | 8.7 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 8.6 | - |
| Ansible | Traefik | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots |




