Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Wind River Cloud Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Red Hat JBoss EAP
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Wind River Cloud Platform
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Wind River Studio Cloud Platform is an open source, production-grade distributed Kubernetes solution for managing edge cloud infrastructure. Based on the OpenStack StarlingX project, the cloud platform in Studio represents a compilation of open source technology that delivers features needed to deploy and manage distributed networks.N/A
Pricing
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWind River Cloud Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Red Hat JBoss EAPWind River Cloud Platform
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWind River Cloud Platform
Features
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWind River Cloud Platform
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
6.8
9 Ratings
15% below category average
Wind River Cloud Platform
-
Ratings
IDE support6.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation5.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWind River Cloud Platform
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.7 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.7 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.7 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWind River Cloud Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.7
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.5
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWind River Cloud Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat
JBoss EAP is subscription based/open source platform. It's very reliable and great for deploying high transaction Java based enterprise applications. It integrates well with third party components like mod_cluster and supports popular Java EE web-based frameworks such as Spring, Angular JS, jQuery Mobile, and Google Web Toolkit.
Read full review
Wind River
No answers on this topic
Pros
Red Hat
  • MOD_CLUSTER integration. JBoss EAP integrates pretty well with mod_cluster. This is an intelligent load balancer especially useful in highly clustered environments.
  • Supports enterprise-grade features such as high availability clustering, distributed caching, messaging etc.
  • Supports deployment in on-premise, virtual and hybrid cloud environments.
Read full review
Wind River
No answers on this topic
Cons
Red Hat
  • Difficult to replicate configuration outside of a container environment
  • Still requires quite a bit of knowledge of the CLI
  • Integration with deployment tools requires CLI knowledge
Read full review
Wind River
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Red Hat
We are planning to migrate away from Jboss to Tomcat as Jboss has shown not interest in supporting OSGi which is heavily used at our shop
Read full review
Wind River
No answers on this topic
Usability
Red Hat
JBoss overall is easy to use. The installation and deployment of applications are quick. Documentations and support are also readily available.
Read full review
Wind River
No answers on this topic
Performance
Red Hat
JBoss EAP is lightweight and doesn't really consumes much physical resources. It's high performing and suites well for high transaction Java enterprise applications. The out of box performance settings are not really great and you will have to configure the settings to suite your environment to leverage it's full benefits.
Read full review
Wind River
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Red Hat
Fast response.
Read full review
Wind River
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Red Hat
We selected JBoss because of compatibility with EJB's. We currently are trying to reduce our footprint and will highly consider using Tomcat.
Read full review
Wind River
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Red Hat
  • Jboss EAP is easy to deploy and configure. This lead to lower cost and faster delivery.
  • Even though we have large number of machines running JBoss, we have only two Jboss Administrators. It doesn't requires too much administration and maintenance on daily basis and reduces number of administrators required for large implementations.
Read full review
Wind River
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots