Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization vs. Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenShift Virtualization is a feature of Red Hat OpenShift that offers a unified, scalable platform for migrating traditional VMs. It ensures consistent management across hybrid cloud environments and supports modernization efforts.N/A
Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Score 6.1 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat Virtualization (formerly Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization, broadly known as RHEV) is an enterprise level server and desktop virtualization solution. Red Hat Virtualization also contains the functionality of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization for Desktop in later editions of the platform.
$999
Per Year Per Hypervisor
Pricing
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationRed Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Standard
$999.00
Per Year Per Hypervisor
Premium
$1,499.00
Per Year Per Hypervisor
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationRed Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationRed Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Considered Both Products
Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
its great and I would reccomend it to for managing VM's and helping to transition the workloads to a more container workflow
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
They go hand in hand, makes sense for someone with knowledge if both. Creates the ecosystem with single management plane.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
I choose those products because in my organization we use a lot. As well, those products are very important for our improvement.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Microsoft Windows
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
They are all perfectly serviceable options but Red Hat virtualization seemed like a better fit for our technical needs, our existing environment, and the quality of our vendor relationship.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Azure VMware Solution, Oracle Virtualization and Nutanix AHV
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure, Hyper-V and SUSE Rancher
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Proxmox VE and VMware ESXi
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Proxmox VE
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
We do Ansible Automation Platform to facilitate our code deployments, to resolve vulnerabilities etc and that does simplify the work that we do. Likewise, OpenShift Virtualization helps simplify operating system maintenance etc
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
I haven't used it yet.

aun no lo utilizo
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
It is better from the point of view of costs, but also provides a better management and extended features.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Nothing like OpenShift. Actually, this was our first one. We toyed with maybe doing raw Kubernetes, but with an enterprise company you need an enterprise product.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
SUSE Rancher
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
It was microsoft hypervisor and vmware.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Cisco Compute Hyperconverged with Nutanix
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
OpenShift is moving in the direction of VMware and is a good first step in the process.
Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Red Hat Virtualization is the best enterprise-level virtualization software for an organization that needs cost-effective and flexible solutions for its environment. We can easily integrate RHEV with other Red Hat software like OpenStack...etc. RHEV is highly customizable …
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
RHV has the following advantages:
  • They have relatively cheaper subscriptions compared to others.
  • With the future going to Openstack and containerization migrating to KVM-based virtualization will be easier to migrate to future products.
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Compared to oVirt, RHEV is more stable but has fewer capabilities. ESX is far more difficult to automate.
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
  • Red Hat Enterprise is more expensive but better supported when it comes to support.
  • Amazon WorkSpaces had more online documentation and resources to scan through.
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
RHEV is an excellent product, includes more features, is less expensive, and has rock solid reliability and is backed with the best Red Hat Support in the industry. RHEV uses KVM under the hood which is used by all the big players in the industry (AWS, Rackspace, etc) to lower …
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
RHEV offers a decent GUI and many management features, such as an API.
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
We use them both, as one is not better than the other at all facets required. There is still a need to use both products, as we have not fully switched to RHEV due to Vsphere still having an edge over them with edits available to the systems while they are operational or they …
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
VMware ESXi is a more mature technology, as it has been around for a longer period of time. However, automating ESXi installations requires hacking OEM media and an intense amount of knowledge of how ESXi operates under the hood. The WebUI and associated functionality for ESXi …
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Pretty much Open Source sums it up.
Chose Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
RHEV is more stable than ovirt but less capability. Much easier to automate than esx
Features
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationRed Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Server Virtualization
Comparison of Server Virtualization features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
-
Ratings
Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
7.7
Ratings
4% below category average
Virtual machine automated provisioning00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Management console00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Live virtual machine backup00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Live virtual machine migration00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Hypervisor-level security00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationRed Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Small Businesses
Hyper-V
Hyper-V
Score 8.2 out of 10
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationRed Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationRed Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
I believe that Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization is a very promising option for hypervisor at the moment and it seems to be improving quickly. Red Hat is doing a great job working with customers on feature set requests and improving UX and stability
Read full review
Red Hat Virtualization is suitable for small implementation and hosting VMs. However, when you start asking for additional features or enhancements, the engineering team is not the flexible as other engineering teams in Red Hat. It is very likely they will not accept adding features or in the best case. They wouldn't commit to a plan when it is possible to be available.
Read full review
Pros
  • Easiness of deployment, we can deploy the full stack completely and hardened easier than other container products
  • Used to host different workloads (CNF and VNF).
  • Easy to scale on both the worker and the infra layer
  • Infra nodes do not require subscriptions, which means we are only paying for our workload only, and no hidden costs.
Read full review
  • RHV issues/bugs can be reported via Bugzilla to RH support. The service is great and typically responds soon.
  • Red Hat distribution integration is seamless as it is integrated into the kernel.
  • OpenStack support enables more customized VM templates and network configuration control.
Read full review
Cons
  • Because of how different virtualization is done, there is a learning curve to overcome when switching to it from another hypervisor.
  • Documentation needs to be improved. Just finding the details to set it up is a burden that will keep some people using it.
Read full review
  • Documentation of RHEV needs more improvement.
  • RHEV GUI needs a lot of improvements in some versions of RHEV, GUI will not work properly (shows incorrect details of VM ).
  • Need fast rollout of patch releases.
  • Need good linux Knowledge to manage the RHEVM.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenShift is really easy of use through its management console. OpenShift gives a very large flexibility through many inbuilt functionalities, all gathered in the same place (it's a very convenient tool to learn DevOps technics hands on) OpenShift is an ideal integrated development / deployment platform for containers
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The product is maturing at an amazing rate, but there is still work to do to reach existing VMware customers. Most notably are the HA/DR features, and backup/recovery. We need to have faster backup capabilities, and I know this is in the works with change block tracking - but it is a challenge today. Some users are also scared by the number of volumes created by Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization, as opposed to the number of VMFS volumes they are used to.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
We have already hab cases in which our customers have a better application performance even in legacy architectures running on Jboss, and even more on cloud native architectures. Customers who hosted their applications on Jboss and wildfly, when running on top of Red Hat OpenShift could benefit from more stability and availability, and in some cases, gains of performance.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Speedy support
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
The learning curve is quite high but worth it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Some of the various other Kubernetes out there, including Rancher, is probably one of the biggest one. Rancher has a reputation for being very easy to implement. I've found that Red Hat OpenShift is just as easy to implement as Rancher. People just don't really know about it. Nutanix is another hypervisor out there competing with Red Hat OpenShift. Again, I think OpenShift virtualization but maybe isn't as old as Nutanix. I do feel it's more mature.
Read full review
Red Hat Virtualization is the best enterprise-level virtualization software for an organization that needs cost-effective and flexible solutions for its environment. We can easily integrate RHEV with other Red Hat software like OpenStack...etc. RHEV is highly customizable software, which helps us to customize our environment. Since RHEV is an open-source tool, we can install it on any hardware. There is no proprietary dependency.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has allowed us to see where we need to be in the container world. I'm going to call it a net neutral impact, not negative or positive. It has given us a sense of what we are ready for and what we're not ready for. You know where you stand.
  • You don't know what you don't know, so it helps us know what we want to know.
Read full review
  • It has had an extremely positive impact on my overall business and has allowed me to utilize and leverage it as an offering to my clients.
  • It's an extremely solid, robust, and reliable product built off of KVM Virtualization technology.
  • Less expensive solution than VMware and includes more features!
Read full review
ScreenShots