Reval is a treasury and risk management platform allowing users to manage cash, liquidity and financial risk. Developed by the company Reval, the software and company were acquired by ION in 2016.
N/A
SAP Treasury and Risk Management
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
SAP Treasury and Risk Management for enterprises provides enhanced cash and liquidity planning, among other treasury management features.
N/A
Pricing
Reval
SAP Treasury and Risk Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Reval
SAP Treasury and Risk Management
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Reval
SAP Treasury and Risk Management
Features
Reval
SAP Treasury and Risk Management
Treasury Management
Comparison of Treasury Management features of Product A and Product B
Reval is suited to a large number of transactions across a disaggregated business. It may not be well suited where especially complex derivatives and highly stylized reporting are required.
SAP Risk and Treaury is well suited for corporate industrial use. SAP has accumulted industrial experience of cash management and worth of the 100% money invested cause this fact reduces your time to get ERP treasury project launched as full functional. Needs more customised solution if applied to banks treasury (money market instruments focus, different accounting plan, internal risk management rules). Pricing is the main limitation: available for mostly large corporate and well financed projects but worth every dime spend on it
It would be nice if all reports could have the same recurrence options (some reports allow for the date range to be the last full month while others require a specific date range).
It is difficult to discontinue some recurring reports that are no longer used.
They are usually prompt and reliable. Occasionally, we have time difference issues as support is often offshore some local staff turnover since ION acquired Reval, but this has been managed.
GTreasury acquired Visual Risk (which was an alternative product), but we preferred Reval for processing grunt (albeit GTreasury/Visual risk had an easier user interface). Have used Sungard/Quantum previously, however, I haven't looked at it recently.
Some of the edges I have found are [the] following: Risk universe building support and navigation, Transactions back to back stacking and control on [the] roll out if your logic, Integration with risk and compliance dashboard, ease of customizing reporting dashboards both from the perspectives of treasury transactions along with risk Profiling and risk reporting.
