Likelihood to Recommend Reval is suited to a large number of transactions across a disaggregated business. It may not be well suited where especially complex derivatives and highly stylized reporting are required.
Read full review SAP Risk and Treaury is well suited for corporate industrial use. SAP has accumulted industrial experience of cash management and worth of the 100% money invested cause this fact reduces your time to get ERP treasury project launched as full functional. Needs more customised solution if applied to banks treasury (money market instruments focus, different accounting plan, internal risk management rules). Pricing is the main limitation: available for mostly large corporate and well financed projects but worth every dime spend on it
Read full review Pros Automates liquidity management via bank account interfaces across a large number of global bank accounts Enables decentralized access and management at, local, regional, and global levels End-to-end tracking, reporting, accounting, and settlement of all derivative and financial trades. Read full review Trading platform integration and deal processing Market data integration Market and credit risk management Regulatory reporting (Hedge) Accounting for financial instruments Read full review Cons The user interface is not as fresh or pretty as some competitors, but is nonetheless very functional. Advanced report-writing likewise is not as simple as some competitors, however once set up, reports are usually easy to modify. Read full review It would be nice if all reports could have the same recurrence options (some reports allow for the date range to be the last full month while others require a specific date range). It is difficult to discontinue some recurring reports that are no longer used. Read full review Likelihood to Renew Customer gets on hold all projects till end of the 2Q 2023. Only support tasks are given.
Read full review Support Rating They are usually prompt and reliable. Occasionally, we have time difference issues as support is often offshore some local staff turnover since ION acquired Reval, but this has been managed.
Read full review Alternatives Considered GTreasury acquired Visual Risk (which was an alternative product), but we preferred Reval for processing grunt (albeit
GTreasury /Visual risk had an easier user interface). Have used Sungard/Quantum previously, however, I haven't looked at it recently.
Read full review Some of the edges I have found are [the] following: Risk universe building support and navigation, Transactions back to back stacking and control on [the] roll out if your logic, Integration with risk and compliance dashboard, ease of customizing reporting dashboards both from the perspectives of treasury transactions along with risk Profiling and risk reporting.
Read full review Return on Investment Excellent ROI in terms of being able to scale volume and complexity without adding headcount Excellent ROI in terms of automation Much more timely and effective management of key financial risks facing the business Read full review You can see your Loses from each one of your states Simulate the process accordingly different data, that way we can avoid taking risk Consolidated information on one place Read full review ScreenShots