TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

AWS CodeCommit vs. RhodeCode

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

AWS CodeCommit

18 Reviews and Ratings

RhodeCode

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AWS CodeCommit

    Score8.2 out of 10
    		N/AAWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It is designed to make it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem.

    $1

    Per Month Per User beyond the fifth

    RhodeCode

    		N/A
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    		RhodeCode is an open source platform that helps manage code of the most secure, behind-the-firewall repositories in a unified way (Mercurial, Git, and Subversion).

    $6.25

    per month per user

    Pricing
    AWS CodeCommitRhodeCode
    Editions & Modules
    Subscription
    $1.00
    Per Month Per User beyond the fifth
    Community Edition
    $0
    Enterprise Edition: Cloud Version
    $8
    per month per user
    Enterprise Edition
    $75
    per year per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AWS CodeCommitRhodeCode
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    AWS CodeCommitRhodeCode
    Small Businesses
    GitHub
    Score9.2 out of 10
    GitHub
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Git
    Score10 out of 10
    Git
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Perforce P4
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Perforce P4
    Score7.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AWS CodeCommitRhodeCode
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AWS CodeCommitRhodeCode
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    Non-cloud users often complain about CodeCommit because it is so barebones, which it is. However, I believe that is by design. It is not supposed to be a full-fledged AI integrated GitLab alternative. Once users or developers get over the learning curve and required Cloud dependency, CodeCommit is a great service that offers a perfect complement / augmentation to on prem options. It is ideal for Cloud-native deployments where the code and production service are close together.
    Verified User
    Read full review
    RhodeCode
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • Lightweight
    • Native IAM integration
    • Collaboration
    • High Availability
    Verified User
    Read full review
    RhodeCode
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • Integration with non-Cloud services
    • Learning curve for devs
    • Barebones
    Verified User
    Read full review
    RhodeCode
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    CodeCommit is a cloud native solution where GitHub is typically run on prem which requires a team to manage the physical servers and the software on top of it. CodeCommit is a better choice when doing Cloud focused workloads. GitHub Copilot offers more features than the leaner CodeCommit, however does not have the same integration options
    Verified User
    Read full review
    RhodeCode
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • 20% reduction in traffic to on-prem GitHub
    • No additional server capacity required
    • No overhead or maintainance
    Verified User
    Read full review
    RhodeCode
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots

    RhodeCode Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot