Selenium vs. Zephyr Enterprise

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Selenium
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Selenium is open source software for browser automation, primarily used for functional, load, or performance testing of applications.N/A
Zephyr Enterprise
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Zephyr Enterprise provides optimization, quality, speed, and processing of testing activities in a single tool. Other features include creating test cases, defining user requirements and generating reports.N/A
Pricing
SeleniumZephyr Enterprise
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SeleniumZephyr Enterprise
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact vendor for pricing information.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SeleniumZephyr Enterprise
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
SeleniumZephyr Enterprise
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
Selenium
-
Ratings
Zephyr Enterprise
9.3
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SeleniumZephyr Enterprise
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.6 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.6 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SeleniumZephyr Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(55 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.2
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(11 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SeleniumZephyr Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
When you have to test the UI and how it behaves when certain actions are performed, you need something that can automate the browsers. This is where Selenium comes to the rescue. If you have to test APIs and not the frontend (UI), I would recommend going with other libraries that support HTTP Requests. Selenium is good only when you have no choice but to run the steps on a browser.
Read full review
SmartBear
  1. Well suited for companies having several applications which need rigorous continuous testing cycles due to periodic upgrades to products/features.
  2. Ideally suited for use cases where there is a need to run sanity and regression suites very frequently.
  3. It is very helpful to have a traceability matrix across Stories/tasks and easy to link all the test cases to be covered to stories.
  4. Variety of reports for Quality Dashboard.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • For any web based UI automation, Selenium is the best tool out there to automate your tests.
  • It supports multiple coding languages like Java, Python, Ruby, C# etc.. to choose from.
  • There is a huge community of users and can get many answers on StackOverFlow.
  • It has lot of other plugins to make your tests even more efficient.
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Creation of Folders, Sub Folder and Releases for various Teams/Projects
  • Ability to create cycles and adding cases to these
  • Ability to copy/clone entire test cycles for regression/sanity needs
  • Linking of defects to Test Cases
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • Selenium is pretty user-friendly but sometimes tests tend to flake out. I'd say roughly one out of twenty tests yields a false positive.
  • Selenium software cannot read images. This is a minor negative because a free plug-in is available from alternate sources.
  • Slowness may be a minor factor with Selenium, though this is an issue with basically any testing software since waiting on a site to execute JavaScript requires the browser to wait for a particular action.
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Better Test case Upload Utility
  • Ability to quickly map test cases from excel to JIRA fields
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Open Source
We love this product mainly because of its high customization abilities and the ease of use. Moreover, its free and can be learned easily through online communities and videos. The tests are more consistent and reliable as compared to Manual tests. It has enabled us to test a large number of features all in one go, which would have impossible through manual tests. The reports generated at the end of the tests are really helpful for the QA and the development teams to get a fair view of the application.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Usability
Open Source
As I mentioned earlier, the reason I use Selenium is because there is a fairly widespread community of users, and user support services are at a good level. because the application is open source, it works on many platforms (Windows, Linux, IOS) without any problems. In addition, it gives us a lot of options for writing functional tests. For errors that we receive through the application, we can easily find the reasons for errors in the forums.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Open Source
Selenium does not have technical support available easily. You have to go through forums to get the information you need. However, there are excellent forums out there that make it easy to troubleshoot. The open-source flexibility makes it difficult to have dedicated support.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Open Source
We did everything we needed to use it. Now we can execute our tests on different operational systems and browsers running few tests simultaneously. We also implemented Appium framework to execute our tests on mobile devices, such as iPhones, iPads, Android phones and tablets. We use SauceLabs for our test execution and Jenkins for continuous integration.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
At the time of adoption, there were not many other alternatives that were even close to being competitive when it comes to browser testing. As far as I know now to this day, there is still little competition to Selenium for what it does. Any other browser-based testing still utilises Selenium to interact with the browser.
Read full review
SmartBear
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • There hasn’t been a downside to using it yet other than we’ve got to update the programs we create for each change.
  • This has saved us hundreds of hours of manpower by allowing our automation engineer to rapid fire tests.
  • We are able to screenshot and save entire sites before and after launch with a program the automation engineer created
  • We can compare large volumes of data against data in excel docs with a program created using Selenium
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Time saving and productivity enhancement for QA teams by preventing context and tool switching
  • High observability to management via QA Dashboards
Read full review
ScreenShots