Serverless360 vs. VMware Cloud Director

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Serverless360
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Serverless360 is a platform to manage and monitor Azure Serverless components related to enterprise integration. In a real-time scenario, the integrated cloud applications are not built with a single technology stack, it typically involves at least 3 or 4 different Azure Services. Currently, Azure Portal is designed more on vertical technology silos and it's difficult to visualize and manage such connected solutions. So Serverless360 is presented by the vendor as a tool that users can depend on…N/A
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
VMware Cloud Director (formerly vCloud Director) is a cloud service-delivery platform used by cloud providers to operate and manage cloud-service businesses. The vendor states that by using VMware Cloud Director, cloud providers deliver secure, efficient, and elastic cloud resources to thousands of enterprises and IT teams across the world.N/A
Pricing
Serverless360VMware Cloud Director
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Serverless360VMware Cloud Director
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Serverless360VMware Cloud Director
Considered Both Products
Serverless360
Chose Serverless360
We choose Serverless360 over others because it is tailor-made for Serverless application on Azure. It provides deeper insights and more granular control specifically designed for Azure Services . Its interface is optimized for Serverless environments making monitoring and …
Chose Serverless360
Metric monitoring in Serverless360 is the best. It eliminates the lengthy process of manually looking through error logs and immediately performs root cause analysis on problems as they arise giving insight into the Azure environment. The team can foresee and fix issues. Our …
VMware Cloud Director
Chose VMware Cloud Director
Another option was own scripting or maintaining the end users in the backend (vcenter). This costs to much time to maintain (scripting) and has a big change of a Security breach. It was not an option for us either way.
Chose VMware Cloud Director
Hyper-V is built on a Windows platform that includes services not needed for the virtual environment adding overhead. With vCloud I'm not required to maintain a host OS or it's updates. The requirement to maintain storage devices is no longer needed with vCloud as well.
Chose VMware Cloud Director
vCloud Director is definitely my favorite as far as cloud managers. The only thing that compares is Cisco UCS Director, but it has slightly different functionality and purpose. I understand why a lot of clients still go with vCloud Director even though VMware intends to sunset …
Features
Serverless360VMware Cloud Director
Cloud Management
Comparison of Cloud Management features of Product A and Product B
Serverless360
9.9
Ratings
12% above category average
VMware Cloud Director
-
Ratings
Cost Management9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Management Performance Monitoring9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Governance and Compliance9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Systems Integration9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Serverless360VMware Cloud Director
Small Businesses
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.5 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 8.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Serverless360VMware Cloud Director
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Serverless360VMware Cloud Director
Likelihood to Recommend
They have very transparent and reasonable pricing. Out of all the cost management tools our team has investigated, Serverless360 stands out for providing the most advantageous and efficient features that aid us in tracking expenses according to specific customers, features, or services. It’s ability to spot the cost spike is commendable.
Read full review
For a CSP it's the best choice. For internal uses, even in presence of different business units, it's not so easy and flexible to manage. It assures a high level of multitenancy, often not needed for internal purposes. But it could be used in this case, just not created for these purposes. Network management is great.
Read full review
Pros
  • Detect and fix issues on production servers faster.
  • Monitors and optimizes API performances.
  • Significantly reduced time to spend on manual entries and troubleshooting.
Read full review
  • Manages multi-tenancy very well. You can setup resource pools of compute, network, and storage that are independent of each other.
  • Easy to create and manage multiple environments.
  • Has lease management technology and can easily set leases and expire them based on pre-configured time frames.
Read full review
Cons
  • The main benefits of Serverless360 is it eases troubleshooting of Azure Pass applications with a log database,
  • With Serverless360's service Map functionality our major burden of holistic view was cured
  • we could understand the health of all the resources in one dashboard.
Read full review
  • Logging, there is a lot of logging but is not always clear where to look for the right logging.
  • The syncing of policy, you can't see if or what he did/didn't sync and the status of it.
  • More integrations with VMware product (click like Availability)
Read full review
Usability
Turbo360 (formerly Serverless360) is the best software intelligence tool out there in market saving us time as it is easy to see data instantly. The software provides business and traffic data information helping our organization make scalability decisions.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We choose Serverless360 over others because it is tailor-made for Serverless application on Azure. It provides deeper insights and more granular control specifically designed for Azure Services . Its interface is optimized for Serverless environments making monitoring and management tasks easier. Additionally, Serverless360's pricing structure and customer support were also factors in our decision-making process
Read full review
Another option was own scripting or maintaining the end users in the backend (vcenter). This costs to much time to maintain (scripting) and has a big change of a Security breach. It was not an option for us either way.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Provides us with a full view of azure territory.
  • It monitors and speedily fixes incidents in azure apps minimizing time spent on troubleshooting.
  • We can synch two different environs with different authentication rules.
Read full review
  • vCloud Director requires less IT administration. For example, there isn't a need to maintain esx host. or storage administration like creating luns.
  • A negative impact is cost. vCloud Director has a monthly cost for storage, processor core, memory, and licensing.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Serverless360 Screenshots

Screenshot of Composite Application logically groups together various resources from Azure Subscriptions (same or multiple subscriptions) and namespaces that represent a Line of Business (LoB) application in your application architecture.Screenshot of Business Activity Monitoring (BAM) gives full visibility of your end-to-end business process flow across your Azure resources.Screenshot of Day wise Cost spent on a specific resource or resource type or environment can be attained by choosing the line chartScreenshot of Cost visualisation capability in Resouce Map feature of Serverless360 comes in to provide the required clarity on the spending in your Azure subscription in fact across subscriptions.Screenshot of A physical representation of the architecture, the user can derive relationships between the resources that constitute the composite applicationScreenshot of Data Monitoring helps to assess historical data and generating alerts based on expected criteria.