Smoothwall WAM vs. Symantec SiteMinder

We currently are working to set up Single Sign On and auto provisioning with a new vendor. Symantec SiteMinder visualizes things like SAML responses and assertion attributes within the console extremely clearly. This makes making adjustments on the Vendor's side or even working with Vendor support clear and effective. The only time I would avoid trying use Symantec SiteMinder as a local IDP would be when I am trying to minimize complexity or overhead troubleshooting needs.

Incentivized

• Federation Services
• Detailed logging for troubleshooting
• Console management is clear and easy to use for less experienced techs

Incentivized

• Guided tutorials within the console
• Visual connection testing
• Support can be difficult to contact

Incentivized

6.5 Symantec SiteMinder's usability is high but the barrier to entry can be intimidating for an unfamiliar user. Symantec SiteMinder support can be difficult to get a hold of when needed leading to situations where you're not sure how to proceed. Overall, if you have experience with SSO, federations, SAML, and IDP's, then you will be fine

Incentivized

We use Microsoft Windows Azure AD which can act similarly in comparison to Symantec SiteMinder. While this experience is somewhat narrow, Symantec SiteMinder seems to have more flexability/customization and caters to the crown that prefers to automate and work with linux. I am less familiar with Azure's automated abilities, however, Symantec SiteMinder allows to automate various factors that already line up with our existing Linux environment and setup

Incentivized

• Extremely flexible/customizable partnership federations
• Consolidation of SSO settings in one place
• Requires more knowledge and therefore more time training

Incentivized