SpiraPlan vs. TrueProject

We selected SpiraPlan because the workflow allows us to start simple without adopting an entire methodology. It suits small teams and single users really well.

Typical project management tools provide you with trailing information that is not forthcoming on impending problems until it’s too late. Only TrueProject predicts and alerts you of problems while there is still time to solve them. It's time to start managing projects through a heads-up display.

Incentivized

• Flexible requirements organisation structure. I'm able to group and sub-group requirements as I see fit.
• Competitive product pricing. Paying by active use instead of registered user was the winning point.
• UI is straightforward and easy to use.

• Predict project problems in advance
• Protects our organization from costly project failure
• Confirms best practices compliance, identifies non-productive activities, and predicts project risks while there is time to act.

Incentivized

• Access from South East Asia is rather sluggish. Could be due to server location.
• Complimentary phone app to do simple tasks (e.g. create tasks, create requirements, add comments) offline would be beneficial because access to the internet can be an issue at the customer's environment.

• Use of generative AI

Incentivized

Main differentiating factors: 1. Lightweight process 2. Plans based on active users instead of registered users.

• Allows us to manage simple IT requirements without major upfront costs. Allows us to expand our process complexity at our own pace.
• Slow UI response from a South East Asia country can make data entry a drag.

• Saved millions of dollars that would have been lost to failed or challenged technology projects.

Incentivized