SUSE Rancher vs. Syself

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SUSE Rancher
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Developed by Rancher Labs and now from SUSE, Rancher is open-source software that enables organizations to deploy and manage Kubernetes at scale, on any infrastructure across the data center, cloud, branch offices, and the network edge. Rancher centrally manages Kubernetes clusters across the organization in order to ensure security and accelerate transformation. Rancher is also available hosted. Hosted Rancher is a fully managed Rancher control plane - presented as the fastest, most cost…
$7,594.99
per year up to 500 nodes
Syself
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Syself offers a simplified Kubernetes Management Platform, used to build reliable environments with 100% reproducibility in just a few steps, no need for in-house experts. With its roots in open-source, Syself states they maintain projects used by hundreds of organizations, running thousands of servers daily on cloud infrastructure. The Syself Kubernetes Platform manages the entire lifecycle of clusters, from creation to scaling and upgrades. Key features: • Ease of use:…
$299
per month
Pricing
SUSE RancherSyself
Editions & Modules
Subscription license
7,594.99
per year up to 500 nodes
Standard Subscription
11,234.99
per year 10 nodes
Priority Subscription
30,514.99
per year 10 nodes
Management Server Priority Subscription
41,830.99
per year 1 instance
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SUSE RancherSyself
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SUSE RancherSyself
Features
SUSE RancherSyself
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
SUSE Rancher
7.6
7 Ratings
6% below category average
Syself
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Orchestration8.77 Ratings00 Ratings
Cluster Management7.57 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Management6.86 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization7.66 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools6.66 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks7.27 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery7.96 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SUSE RancherSyself
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SUSE RancherSyself
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(17 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.8
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
4.5
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SUSE RancherSyself
Likelihood to Recommend
SUSE
SUSE Rancher as a management tool becomes useful on a larger scale. Small deployments not so much. If someone also requires Kubernetes capacity or storage, Rancher is an excellent choice. Also, without Kubernetes' skills, it is unlikely that Rancher deployment is going to be a success. Then again if someone else is managing your Kubernetes capacity, setting up the software's capacity will yield greater control. Rancher is not a very integrated solution similar to others in the market.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Pros
SUSE
  • Public and private cloud infrastructure providers based on K8s CAPI
  • REST API that can be used to integrate company services with Rancher
  • GUI that is easy to learn and use in daily operations
  • Builtin GitOps automation solution based on Fleet project
  • It is fully open source
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Cons
SUSE
  • No possibility to snapshot Projects. You can snapshot and restore the whole Kubernetes cluster, but not a Project or Namespace. For this, you have to use external tools.
  • You cannot detach the Rancher-created Kubernetes clusters from Rancher management.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Usability
SUSE
Overall it deserves an 8 out of 10. The platform is very easy to use as long as the UI is stable. We have had a few buggy versions in the past. However the CLI is excellent and the platform is simple to manage and maintain. It is easy to deploy and offer for company wide use which increases utilization and ROI.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
SUSE
The documentation is quite complete and there is a very active community that is willing to collaborate and answer questions for those who are just starting out.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
SUSE
We started using SUSE Rancher in the early days and spent a large amount of time getting to know and love it. This was before the days of some of the likes of Amazon Web Services who may now provide a cheaper but less feature-rich alternative to SUSE Rancher, however we have yet to explore this.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
SUSE
The investment for small environments is quite significant. There has to be a compelling case to enhance the areas where SUSE Rancher brings in value to make such a financial leap. There is also a free version to test the value propositions, which will help support the user's buying decisions. More clusters, more volume, more tasks and more complexity in the environment equals more value that Rancher can provide.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
SUSE
  • Shortens "Time-to-Market" factor for new business applications or implementing new functionalities. From 1 to 50 microservices-based business applications in 6 years.
  • 24/7 availability, generates more money. There are many infrastructure components that are regularly powered-off for maintenance or upgrade, bur we rarely are turning off our downstream Kubernetes clusters where our business applications lives.
  • Single Point of Contact with platform maintenance and development Team, eases implementation of new business applications
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots