Tenable Security Center vs. Veracode
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Tenable Security Center | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) from Tenable Network Security in Baltimore, presents a vulnerabiliy management option used to identify and prioritize vulnerabilities based on risk to businesses. It is managed on premises. | N/A |
Veracode | Score8.5 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine. | N/A |
| Tenable Security Center | Veracode | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Developer pricing options available | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Tenable Security Center | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 6 Answers | 92% Would buy again 128 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | 96% Delivers good value for the price 90 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | 95% Happy with the feature set 132 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | 95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 76 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | 86% Implementation went as expected 101 Answers | |
| Tenable Security Center | Veracode | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tenable Security Center | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Rencore Code (SPCAF) Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 | Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security Score9.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 | Checkmarx Score7.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Tenable Security Center | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 8.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 6.3 |
| Usability | 9.0 | 5.5 |
| Availability | - | 7.3 |
| Performance | - | 2.7 |
| Support Rating | 9.4 | 7.6 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 5.5 |
| Configurability | - | 6.4 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 4.5 |
| Ease of integration | - | 6.4 |
| Product Scalability | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.2 |
| Tenable Security Center | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Veracode Screenshots |









