TestCollab vs. Tuskr

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
TestCollab
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
TestCollab is a QA software used to organize test cases, automate test execution with AI, and accelerate releases in agile teams. It aims to provide a complete platform for application testing, and integrates with popular bug trackers and test automation tools. It also supports agile methodology, requirements management, test plans and scheduling. It features an QA Copilot, an AI-powered, No-Code test automation solution that turns everyday language into…
$35
per month per user
Tuskr
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Tuskr is a cloud-based test management software. Users can manage test cases, conduct test runs and integrate with bug and time tracking tools. Tuskr is available via a free plan, and with a 30-day free trial of paid tier features.
$45
per month 5 users (minimum)
Pricing
TestCollabTuskr
Editions & Modules
Premium
$35
per month per user
Premium (Monthly Subscription)
$35
per month per user
Elite
$45
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Team
$9
per month per user
Business
$15
per month per user
Enterprise
$29
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
TestCollabTuskr
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details16% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
TestCollabTuskr
Features
TestCollabTuskr
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
TestCollab
-
Ratings
Tuskr
9.9
24 Ratings
20% above category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings9.923 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings9.924 Ratings
Best Alternatives
TestCollabTuskr
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.9 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.9 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
TestCollabTuskr
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(25 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
TestCollabTuskr
Likelihood to Recommend
Test Collab Software LLC
No answers on this topic
Celoxis
Its interface, features and dashboard which help a lot to streamline the workflow. And its really very ease to use. My team and I just use this software and adapt in a week. I surely recommend to any organisation, in regards of pricing, features and interface. And their customer support.
Read full review
Pros
Test Collab Software LLC
No answers on this topic
Celoxis
  • Its easy to import test cases in Tuskr by using the csv import feature
  • Test runs are easy to create and can include test cases from multiple suits.
  • Reports of test runs make it easier to track all the cases that were covered at a particular instance before giving a release signoff.
Read full review
Cons
Test Collab Software LLC
No answers on this topic
Celoxis
  • When you click into a specific test, the status automatically clears. it would be nice for this to be preserved when clicking in instead of clearing
  • It would be nice to be able to add comments specific to certain steps in each test, instead of just one big comment box
  • Since we use Tuskr for QA, we structure it as a table with instructions and expected results. because these are side by side, sometimes it is hard to go in a step-by-step order when there are multiple QA steps to take to complete the test.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Test Collab Software LLC
No answers on this topic
Celoxis
Tuskr suits our organization needs
Read full review
Usability
Test Collab Software LLC
No answers on this topic
Celoxis
The test case management and automating repetitive tasks, Tuskr saves significant time for my QA teams. The whole process was very easy for my team to adapt and get comfortable with other software. We were continuously able to improve our business and this had a significant positive impact on customer satisfaction and retention.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Test Collab Software LLC
No answers on this topic
Celoxis
I have not worked with related testing suite before but Tuskr has been the favorite platform for running test suites. It has generated positive leads from the company data by offering the necessary testing support. It is easy to integrate with other applications to suit business demands. The system generate results from various testing suites that can shared with our clients.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Test Collab Software LLC
No answers on this topic
Celoxis
  • Everyone in the team can go and read how to perform a specific test and note down the result of it which can be viewed by anyone
  • We can filter based on results understanding what test cases are failing from previous runs
  • Helps save a lot of time, effort and minimises future issues
Read full review
ScreenShots

TestCollab Screenshots

Screenshot of the TestCollab interfaceScreenshot of collaborative test planningScreenshot of where to customize templates and workflowScreenshot of some of the available integrations for defect tracking, requirements management, and automation systems

Tuskr Screenshots

Screenshot of Progress MonitoringScreenshot of Create Flexible test casesScreenshot of Distribute Workload