TestDrive vs. Worksoft Connective Automation Platform

The more our business grew, the more we felt the risk on the horizon in that we needed somewhere to really manage and document our testing evidence. So, TestDrive helped us through the testing phase of the project by documenting and being able to access testing results, and also we had a broader scale view around regression testing.

Incentivized

• As I have worked with various ERP automation tools, Worksoft certify is a best tool in terms of End-to-End testing for SAP business processes.
• It is easy to understand by business people

Incentivized

• Easy automation.
• Great customer service.
• Easy script running.
• Relatively easy to implement.

Incentivized

• Prepared 25 end-to-end scenarios that leveraged 3,000 manual test cases and this was a big achievement for the customer to save the regression time and resources.
• It is fast to automate SAP projects
• Improved development cycle and nowadays customers are expecting "lights off" automation. We have scheduled lights off automation mode through Worksoft Certify.

Incentivized

• Not suitable for small applications.

Incentivized

• Worksoft Certify solution could be a bit more intuitive and user friendly
• Test Data Management - No testing system will work with bad or interpreted data

Incentivized

We have not tried other similar products so it is difficult to say, but we definitely enjoy this product and the support team to work with

Incentivized

SAP TAO is only alternate tool I would suggest.

Incentivized

• Thanks to TestDrive, our automation is always ready to run, and the script maintenance lag is removed, testing can go ahead, and issues are found quicker.
• We no longer worry about varying response times for the application, nor do we no need to code "timing loops" to check if the application is in the right state.

Incentivized

• Positive: End to End business process validation and Fast Test development
• Licenses issues should be minimized

Incentivized