IBM Confluent vs. TIBCO Messaging

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Confluent
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments.
$385
per month
TIBCO Messaging
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
TIBCO offers high-performance messaging technology, and gives customers flexibility and unique choice between Commercial and Open-source messaging solutions. TIBCO Messaging is a comprehensive messaging portfolio available to meet a wide variety of use cases and deployment models.N/A
Pricing
IBM ConfluentTIBCO Messaging
Editions & Modules
Basic
$0
Standard
Starting at ~$385
per month
Enterprise
Starting at ~$1,150
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM ConfluentTIBCO Messaging
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsConfluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM ConfluentTIBCO Messaging
Best Alternatives
IBM ConfluentTIBCO Messaging
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 5.1 out of 10
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM ConfluentTIBCO Messaging
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
7.7
(35 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM ConfluentTIBCO Messaging
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
If you have a need to stream data, real time or segmented structured data then Confluent is a great platform to do so with. You won't run into packet transfer size limitations that other platforms have. Flexibility in on-prem, cloud, and managed cloud offerings makes it very flexible no matter how you choose to implement.
Read full review
Cloud Software Group
Organization which uses TIBCO Business Works or TIBCO Business Process Management or TIBCO BPM Enterprise can make use of TIBCO Messaging as it works well with other TIBCO tools. Many TIBCO tools have TIBCO Messaging products bundled as a package along with other TIBCO tools. Use of dynamic topics and queues makes run time processing easier.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Products work great.
  • Training is available.
  • Customer support is good.
Read full review
Cloud Software Group
  • Tibco EMS performs very well, and it meets our stringent performance requirements for corporate messaging backbone.
  • Tibco EMS scales well, and this is another of our stringent requirements.
  • Tibco provides good support for the EMS product, and continues to improve it. This is important as we don't want to use something that does not keep up with the changes in the technology landscape.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Cloud based Azure platform features for Confluent lacks behind AWS And GCP
Read full review
Cloud Software Group
  • In terms of TIBCO Messaging, it would nice to have a more out-of-the-box way of linking its objects (queues, topics) directly to those of other popular solutions like MQ or Kafka.
  • Not being able to filter (that is, using selectors) through patterns/subtexts on the message body is missed on occasions.
  • Given the current trends and state-of-art, lift & shift of on-premise EMS clusters to cloud architectures should be more directly attainable.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
No answers on this topic
Cloud Software Group
EMS is a solid system and I see no reason to abandon it, in fact I am eager to see what the next versions will offer and future road maps. Knowing we have support to help us in case of problems is invaluable, both in case of critical issues and to improve overall performance.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform.
Read full review
Cloud Software Group
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations.
Read full review
Cloud Software Group
We also use other messaging products: IBM MQ, especially for integration with other systems (server2server), which has been an industry standard for a long time, and Apache Kafka for cloud-native applications. EMS is a worse option compared to them, but it is still acceptable.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • It enables us to develop event driven application.
  • It increases our ability to handle streaming data.
  • It reduces latency of communication.
Read full review
Cloud Software Group
  • Improved developer productivity as TIBCO Enterprise Message Service requires minimal coding
  • Quicker time to market as the configuration / onboarding can be automated with this tool
  • Ability to onboard more clients/consumers as the tool can handle large volumes seamless
  • Improved visibility on the end to end process as the product provides monitoring by using JMS header information
Read full review
ScreenShots