Tricentis Testim vs. ZAPTEST
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Tricentis Testim | Score7.7 out of 10 | N/A | Testim.io, from Tricentis since the February 2022 acquisition, leverages machine learning for the authoring, execution and maintenance of automated test cases. Testim uses dynamic locators and learns with every execution. It is designed to produce fast authoring and stable tests that learn, thus eliminating the need to continually maintain tests with every code change. | $30,000 per year |
ZAPTEST | Score7 out of 10 | N/A | ZAPTEST, from the company of that name (also known as Zap Technologies) in Alpharetta, Georgia, is a functional testing tool for web and mobile applications. | N/A |
| Tricentis Testim | ZAPTEST | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Tricentis Testim | ZAPTEST | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
93% Would buy again 13 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
92% Delivers good value for the price 12 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
93% Happy with the feature set 13 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
78% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
85% Implementation went as expected 11 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Tricentis Testim | ZAPTEST | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | TestComplete Score8 out of 10 | TestComplete Score8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | OpenText UFT One Score8 out of 10 | OpenText UFT One Score8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SoapUI Open Source Score8.3 out of 10 | SoapUI Open Source Score8.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Tricentis Testim | ZAPTEST | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.5 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.1 | - |
| Usability | 8.2 | - |
| Support Rating | 6.6 | - |
| Tricentis Testim | ZAPTEST | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Tricentis Testim Screenshots |




