Amberscript, headquartered in Amsterdam, helps users transform audio and video to text and subtitles through the use of its AI-driven on-demand software service.
$1.40
per minute
txtplay.ai
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Txtplay.ai is a platform for captioning, transcription, and translation designed for broadcasters, streaming platforms, and organizations that require accurate and scalable speech-to-text workflows. It supports real-time and on-demand processing across 55+ transcription languages and over 100 translation outputs, enabling accessibility, multilingual communication, and global content distribution. Key Capabilities
Real-Time and On-Demand…
$15
per hour (monthly billing) per user
Pricing
Amberscript
txtplay.ai
Editions & Modules
Pre-Paid
$10
per hour of audio or video uploaded
Subscription
$25
per month
Manual transcription
from $1.40
per minute
Pay As You Go
€15
per hour (monthly billing) per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amberscript
txtplay.ai
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
Discount available for annual subscription.
Pay as you go: €15/hour
Business: €50/month (incl. 5 hours) + €10/hour extra
Enterprise: Contact sales
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amberscript
txtplay.ai
Considered Both Products
Amberscript
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Amberscript
I feel that Amazon Transcribe was much more feature-rich, allowing for a much more real-time solution, whereas Amberscript is great for transcribing existing call recordings (or video files) to a rich text file. Amazon Transcribe will do both, while Amberscript only does the …
Amberscript is great for transcribing individual audio (or video) files that reside on your computer. The ability to view and edit the text of the text file (to correct or remove data that you don't want to be shared) before the output is a great option. I feel it may be limited in the ability to transcribe live audio records such as phone calls or meetings, where we would find it very useful to have immediate access to a transcript (for coaching or sharing purposes). I feel the needs are more designed as a solution for pre-existing audio/video files versus working in real-time.
I feel that Amazon Transcribe was much more feature-rich, allowing for a much more real-time solution, whereas Amberscript is great for transcribing existing call recordings (or video files) to a rich text file. Amazon Transcribe will do both, while Amberscript only does the latter. For our business, this was a significant feature loss for Amberscript.
Having an automated speech-to-text conversion allows us to reduce human hours, which would normally take notes or have to review long audio files.
Being able to transcribe multiple call recordings into a searchable text format allows for coaching of issues in a much more efficient format than an audio recording.