Wasabi Object Storage vs. WPS Cloud

Wasabi is just simple and easy to use. It incorprates well with Veeam and other backup solutions. The cost savings alone is enough to make anyone switch. Plus thier reliability has been on great. We havent experienced any down time or issues since converting out cloud backup solution to Wasabi.

Incentivized

Another [good feature] is the [ability] to turn photos into PDFs and file compression. Since the native integration with [the] third parties comes from WPS Office I [feel I] wouldn't recommend it if you [only] need one service.

Incentivized

• AWS S3 compatible APIs.
• Supports custom policies and sub-accounts.
• Much cheaper when compared to AWS S3.

Incentivized

• Integrate with third party platforms via WPS office
• Turn PDFs into DOCs
• allow PDF signing on the fly
• secure storage of information

Incentivized

• Id love to see them add a FIPS compliant container to allow for secure storage for DoD.

Incentivized

• Document sharing with third parties without intermediaries
• Cloud extra space for premium members

Incentivized

Wasabi is a tiny bit more expensive than Backblaze B2 ($5.99 vs $5 per TB per month), and there are minimum storage size/time requirements (1TB, 3Mo), but Wasabi has free traffic each month up to the size of storage which can save you a lot of money.

Incentivized

[I feel] it's a good contender but [it] lacks native third-party integration and internal cross-platform sharing which makes it fall behind. [ I believe It performs at its best] when it comes to file compression and PDF signing.

Incentivized

• The cost savings from previous Cloud backup solution is over 70%
• Ease of backups - Incorporation with Veeam already in place
• Our biggest bottleneck for throughput is our on-prem storage offloading to Wasabi. COuldnt be happier with thier network bandwith.

Incentivized

• improve storage of non legal documents
• improve signing of non legal documents
• simplify the process of compression on the cloud

Incentivized