TrustRadius Insights for Adobe Learning Manager are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.
Pros
Enhanced Learning Experience: Users have praised the personalized learning paths, engaging content, and robust analytics of Adobe Captivate Prime. Some users found the UI customization, swift course deployment, and subscription model to be very beneficial.
Ease of Use and Navigation: Reviewers value the intuitive interface, complete reports, and customization options for dashboard and settings based on organizational needs. The software's straightforward tasks like adding learners and monitoring progress were appreciated by users.
Comprehensive Training Features: Customers highlighted the comprehensive training path allowing extensive tracking of learning progress. The availability of blended learning paths, certifications, user management features, and automated assignments were positively acknowledged by some reviewers.
For our company group L&D this is working perfectly. However for an individual business unit it is a complex system to integrate with our business processes and cannot accommodate most of our regulatory processes. For learners the interface is beautiful and perfect, however for administrators having to manage courses, user admin (non-employed) it becomes a problem with licenses as our industry has a high turn-over of resources who are not employed.
Pros
User interface
Learning paths
Cons
Non-Scorm format tests
Non-Scorm format courses
User administration (external)
Development to fit business processes
Likelihood to Recommend
Human Capital Learning and Development training for employed staff.
Cannot integrate business processes easily, and external staff is a problem to register.
Not having an authoring tool, to build assessments directly instead of a SCORM file.
We use it to try to triangulate how big problems are relative to the requirements we get. And so we often will try to use the learning manager discovery features to kind of see which types of thematic things are coming out biggest to combine with our analytics data for patterns and trends. And so this is one use case that we do is to triangulate.
Pros
I think it identifies things we wouldn't have thought of, and so it allows us to activate on Adobe's AB testing tool, and it allows us to consider different types of attribution for audience creation.
Cons
Differently. Integration with custom built data science models, that would be beautiful. It isn't that like things like Sensei are not good. They're very good, but they're black box. And so if there's a suggestion that's given and it's wrong, it's not defensible. So if it allowed an open architecture or some type of integration with Python or R models, Jupiter Notebooks, other kinds of things that would augment what it generates that would allow a concept of challenger versus champion models to compete. And to understand, that way you can almost like test yours against theirs and improve that way.
Likelihood to Recommend
It's good if you have a good use case for that feed. I do know that you have to incorporate it in a process in isolation. It's not you don't realize the full value, so you have to incorporate it into an overall improvement process.
I would say the pro cases are marketing optimization with respect to campaigns. And I would say that the areas it's not well suited is in distilling attribution. So if you were to take all of the improvements that it suggested, the numbers exceed revenue, which isn't real, but that's a hard problem to solve. Nobody's really solved that problem well. So distilling the attribution piece would be good. And it is well suited for marketing campaigns in the ideation phase of so.
I'm not using this one because I'm a reseller, but the main companies that I'm trying to resell, are using it for internal training content that they are providing to their own resources.
Pros
I think the way that the tool does the beginning to the end of the path of the training for research. I mean, when I start to use this one, I can check all my life inside the tool about learning.
Cons
I think that the license model is not a good one because sometimes it does not fit what the customer is asking us. So I think that should be a little flexible, the license model can be better.
Likelihood to Recommend
The best part is for internal training. For the HR area of the whole company deserves a tool for learning. So I think that the best part is working with the HR resources.
While it is a great program that can build entire online learning courses, we were not able to implement it to the fullest at our school. The learning curve is a little high with all the other changes we had going on moving to virtual instruction.
Pros
Robust course creation
Great interactivity
Cons
Steep learning curve
Likelihood to Recommend
Adobe Captivate Prime is well suited for create learning modules that a company would want employees to complete at their leisure for training within their company. Accounts can be created and progress within the courses can be tracked.
VU
Verified User
Employee in Information Technology (51-200 employees)
Only our IT department uses it. It’s helped recently with E-commerce compliance issues we had. Some employees use the tool to work on their skill sets.
Pros
Concise learning
Content is relatable
Content is not boring
Cons
Being able to see progress of others learning experiences
Likelihood to Recommend
We have a variety of positions in our IT department, this tool is great for those using Adobe products. We use Adobe commerce and Adobe Acrobat.
VU
Verified User
Program Manager in Information Technology (201-500 employees)
At Instituto SantaFe we use Adobe Learning Manager for external customer training. Thanks to this platform, it has been possible to solve the challenge of continuing with virtual education in a sustained and efficient way. The Adobe Learning Manager functionalities, as well as its intuitive interface, make it a great ally for online training.
Pros
Suitable functionalities
Intuitive interface
Complete reports
Cons
Include the possibility of having course templates to save time in the configuration
Include several access options through other emails or platforms such as facebook, linkedin, etc.
Probably include the possibility of integrating AI
Likelihood to Recommend
Adobe Learning Platform Manager is excellent for continuing education, professional training, and lifelong learning formats. It has reports and options that make it very suitable for an agile and non-bureaucratic management. Perhaps due to the type of functionalities, format and tools available, it is less suitable for formal education formats, university courses or school courses for children.
It has helped our Learning & development division very effectively. It helped us get huge amounts of people trained and certified, and it's a great LMS. Its powerful ability to create different types of e-learning content easily. It's easy to navigate and see all my courses which are related to recruitment or project management.
Pros
E-learning
Training modules
Presentation
Cons
user-interface
Expensive
Likelihood to Recommend
I think it is well suited with a large team looking for a effective tool for Learning and development on different courses. But it is also expensive for smaller teams in a small company.
Our organization/institution employs several approved learning management systems. Adobe Learning Manager, which we also were familiar to as Adobe Captive Prime, was utilized for in-house learning for professional development and training or re-skilling for our post-graduate level of professional skills and development. The reason we utilized this product was a colleague who was familiar with gamified training products had recommended this.
Pros
Personalized learning - there are ways to set-up the learning path that is most useful to each learner.
Gamification - this allowed for a more engaging and interactive way to deploy training and received positive feedback.
Analytics and Insights - the reporting options and mechanisms available are quite helpful to get feedback on training progress and helps provide insight on what is working well.
Cons
View on different devices is inconsistent in experience. For example on the desktop it seems find but on handheld devices like mobile or smaller tablets the display is not as good.
We found that users had to clear cache and history to troubleshoot quite often relative to other applications.
It would be great to have more automated marking as completed as sometimes we found this had to be done more manually.
Likelihood to Recommend
Good for simple in-house training and professional development to re-skill or up-skill existing workforce with a new and engaging learning management system that offers relatively good reporting. More appropriate for training to be done on desktop or laptop. Less appropriate for scenarios where training is expected to occur using smaller devices as the primary hardware used by the trainee.
VU
Verified User
Professional in Finance and Accounting (5001-10,000 employees)