TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Virtual Machines

Score8.1 out of 10

101 Reviews and Ratings

Get a Demo

What is Azure Virtual Machines?

Virtual Machines (VMs) are available on Microsoft Azure, providing what is built as a low-cost, per-second compute service, available via Windows or Linux.

Categories & Use Cases

Key Features

Learn about the best (and worst!) features Azure Virtual Machines has to offer, as determined by TrustRadius' reviewers.
Based on 101 ratings of Azure Virtual Machines's features
View all features

Top Performing Features

  • Virtual machine automated provisioning

    Automation of virtual machine provisioning through use of vm templates

    Category average: 7.6

  • Live virtual machine migration

    Downtime minimization by migrating live vms between hosts and across clusters

    Category average: 7.7

  • Hypervisor-level security

    Hypervisor-level security including antivirus and anti-malware

    Category average: 8.2

Areas for Improvement

  • Live virtual machine backup

    Ability to backup vms without interrupting service

    Category average: 7.7

  • Management console

    Management console for central administration of vm environment

    Category average: 7.9

Reviews

What users are saying about Azure Virtual Machines.
View all reviews

Azure Virtual Machines usefulness and good investment considering ROI

Incentivized
Gourab DasView profile
Senior Manager in Information Technology at SbI Card (1001-5000 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

in Azure Virtual Machines we have multiple applications are hosted as IAAS.
There are about 1000 of Azure Virtual Machines hosted, for different application.
Multiple types of environments like dev, test, DR and Production.

From security, to infra, to web server are there.

Pros

  • Smooth service
  • 999% uptime, considering the yearly performance
  • Timely update and secure integration with other aspects like AD integration, DR activity.

Cons

  • For SPOT instances, sometimes it's goes off as per the feature but a timeline with stability would be great for testing environment considering it's low running cost
  • Access to the Azure Virtual Machines would be smoother. and lesser virtual cpu core would be great
  • Console access in case of troubleshooting is a bit painful area

Return on Investment

  • In case of long term usage, it's beneficial for big business
  • Not so effective for small business
  • the 1month time for trial is very low

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling and Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)

Other Software Used

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, Docker, Kubernetes

Azure Virtual Machines Are A Decent Solution But Have Issues

Verified User
Engineer in Information Technology (5001-10,000 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Azure Virtual Machines to host basic functionality at the moment but plan to expand in the following year to include critical applications.

Pros

  • Remote Desktop management capability
  • Basic Windows functionality

Cons

  • No ability to view the VM console
  • Management interface for VMs leaves a lot to be desired
  • Changing CPU/memory on a VM is convoluted
  • No shared storage for OS

Return on Investment

  • Long term, it will allow decommission of a very expensive datacenter

Usability

Alternatives Considered

VMware vCenter

Other Software Used

NetApp AFF A-Series, NetApp FAS Storage Arrays, Veeam Data Platform, VMware vCenter

Azure Virtual Machines are a great choice for any task

Incentivized
Verified User
Engineer in Information Technology (201-500 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I usually use them to host enterprise apps, or to test functionalities in conjunction and integration with other azure services. As part of a bigger solution. Depending on the app I also limit which services have access to it as well as specific users. Also love to use bastion besides rdp and ssh

Pros

  • Data science virtual machines
  • Hosting on premises apps
  • Integration with other azure services

Cons

  • Simplify the deployment
  • More offerings for virtual machines

Return on Investment

  • They are cheap
  • They integrate well with other azure products
  • Automated deployment is amazing

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Microsoft Azure Key Vault

Other Software Used

Microsoft Azure Key Vault, Azure Data Lake Storage

Why Azure Cloud Virtual Machines just is.

Incentivized
Allan Allitt
SRE in Information Technology at PA Media Group (1001-5000 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Azure Virtual Machines to mainly manage our end-user web platform utilizing its web app plans, we also sit VM servers behind this that contain the data for these web services along with some on-prem servers, we have a VPN direct to Azure and some VPNs direct to clients from our Azure services.

Pros

  • When demand is high, we scale the service out, eg During a Football Match.
  • When a football match is over and the throughput of data from OPTA drops we save by the service scaling back in.
  • Our App Service Plans along with the Clean C# code are lightening fast giving a good customer experience.
  • When producing the TV Guide information and a program overruns its scheduled time, a client can instantly be updated to the new programming schedule as our change is instant and its in the right place for all the clients to download and adjust their television guides appropriately to send out to the public giving a 24x7 uptime service that is precise and accurate and resilient to outages due to failover zones around the world.

Cons

  • Support on VMs doing strange things around NETUSE as a command resulted in constantly being sent over to INDIA where personally I found a real Language Barrier and even after specifically expressing a support service in the UK or the US it did keep finding its way back to a company called MINDTREE, the language barrier was such that after 4 or 5 meetings I was been asked the same questions that I was asked in the initial day 1 meeting and round and round it went, this issue was never resolved, we had to write code and utilize a different workaround to get over having to use the NETUSE command which previous to a VM running Windows server 2019 Datacentre worked fine.
  • Azure Pricing could be more competitive to AWS.
  • Having the ability to control app service plans which at the minute are just something that exists and we are not able to really see what they are doing which becomes an issue when you want to try and bug fix an issue.

Return on Investment

  • We actually saved £76,000 by utilising scaling services correctly from 24 hour uptime servers
  • WE saved £50,000 by Engaging NORDCLOUD and adding there professional discount with MICROSFT by going under there umbrella and they take over the support services to Microsoft.
  • Overall on a personal level I believe Cloud recourses are more expensive than Physical kits and the depreciation plan of physical kit really doesn't happen over 3 years, in reality, people still own kits at 20 years, I'm not saying that is good practice to keep the kit for 20 years but the cost model doesn't really work against what really happens in the world, so Cloud services are something that has pro's and cons and it really has to be what your needing and how your company processes work when trying to gain new kit, it can be far easier to commission a new virtual machine in Azure than it can be to get purchasing to investigate raise orders and actually buy the kit you require, once the process is set up for the Azure purchases the route is already in place and happens much quicker, sometimes, it's even been retrospective as its needed and been provisioned, resolving a priority 1 issue and then decommissioned after the event. you would have to look at what your own personal situation is on this and if this is a benefit or not.

Other Software Used

Veritas Backup Exec, Chef Infra, Dynatrace, Kubernetes Dashboard

Databricks on Azure VMs

Karan DuaView profile
Senior Machine Learning Engineer in Engineering at Oracle (10,001+ employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I used Azure Virtual Machines in my last organization for deploying out Machine Learning model and related workloads on virtual machines. Our requirement was to enable automated deployment of our compute engine - Databricks, our ML models, and Airflow workflows on scalable virtual machines and Azure Virtual Machines was our choice in the last organization I worked with.

Pros

  • Rapid Scalability
  • Variety of elastic storage options
  • Flexibility and control for app deployment
  • Regular Updates for security and feature upgrades
  • Fault tolerance
  • Native Integration with Databricks

Cons

  • Pricing can be a bit better
  • Compute types can be increased (AWS EC2 has more)
  • No Bare metal GPU instances as in OCI

Return on Investment

  • Native Databricks deployment and upgradation was a breeze
  • Peace of mind with regards fault tolerance and automated backups
  • Native availability of Windows VMs made it easy to migrate Windows based on prem systems.

Alternatives Considered

Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)