Cisco Embedded Wireless Controller Reviews & Insights

We use Cisco Embedded Wireless Controller for the clients where they need cost effective wireless solution and where not much users are there in their environment. It is best for low and medium size deployment and not recommended at all for large enterprise environment.

Small office like retail shop and office with few users and few AP requirements. In such scenario we can proceed with the EWC deployment as it is cost effective as hardware based WLC is not required and most of the controller features are available on the Embedded controller only

Cisco Embedded Wireless Controller puts this intuitive, powerful control, easy-to-deploy-and-manage WiFi 6 network in the palm of our hands. The built-in enterprise-class security and resilience features always keep the network on and protected. Managing and monitoring the EWC is easy, so we have a reliable WiFi experience that can serve and perform multiple functions to meet the demanding requirements of the business.

Cisco Embedded Wireless Controller offers WiFi 6 capacity and performance, enterprise-class capabilities, and robust security to deploy and manage the wireless network. It is a cost-effective approach to introduce WiFi 6 production or beta network.

Previously we had Cisco wireless LAN controller that took care of all our AP's (adding, removing, programming, etc) which still works great for our main site that keeps everything chugging without much interaction. The problem we had at some sites is that they don't connect back to us in a way we could manage their AP's. Enter the Cisco Embedded [Wireless] Controllers. These guys solve that problem handily.

Overall I could see myself recommending these to others if they have the right set of circumstances at their place of business. Those would be like ours, if they had a location that couldnt be served by a WLC. Once setup they are easy to manage and self healing as in they wont go down when one is offline.

We have a mostly Cisco AP shop but was previously using a Cisco WLAN controller to manage all our APs. At a new HQ site, we wanted to try the new embedded wireless controllers in a simpler way with fewer points of failure than using a centralized WLC. This solves the major problem of a centralized point of failure.

While it is a fairly solid product for the price tag, some places may not want to deal with bugs and glitches that can occur. These are priced below a standard WLC with APs that are centrally managed. So if you have a site with lots of APs that need as much uptime as possible, this may not be the solution for you.