TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cisco Secure Access Reviews & Insights

Score9 out of 10

65 Reviews and Ratings

Top industries

Based on 12 HG Insights installations.

Powered by

Community Insights for Cisco Secure Access

Synthesised from 27 verified reviews.


Synthesised from 27 reviews | Last Published June 6, 2026


Cisco Secure Access is primarily used by organizations to establish secure remote and hybrid connectivity for employees and partners, addressing business problems by modernizing access solutions and consolidating fragmented security tools. In TrustRadius reviews, its robust security features, which consolidate ZTNA, FWaaS, and DNS security, are frequently highlighted, with 19% of reviewers commending them. Reviewers also widely note its ease of initial setup and deployment.

The platform positively impacts business objectives by reducing security risks and improving operational efficiency. However, areas for improvement include the maturity and ease of integration with both Cisco's own ecosystem and third-party solutions, a concern cited by 19% of reviewers. Additionally, some reviewers report complexity in policy configuration and challenges with the user interface. Overall, reviewers find Cisco Secure Access a capable tool for modern security challenges, despite specific integration and configuration hurdles.


  • Consolidates ZTNA, FWaaS, and DNS security into a single solution
  • Straightforward initial setup and ongoing management
  • Provides effective secure remote access for mobile workforces
  • Offers a unified dashboard for service management and reporting
  • Reduces security risks and attack surface
  • Immature integration with Cisco and third-party ecosystems (e.g., EDR, firewalls)
  • Complex policy configuration
  • Challenges with user interface and navigation
  • Limitations in specific feature functionalities
  • Difficulties in overall configuration and management
What other products like Cisco Secure Access have you used or evaluated?

From 27 reviews | Last Published June 6, 2026

Reviewers evaluating Cisco Secure Access frequently cite experience with a range of alternative secure access and zero-trust solutions. The most commonly mentioned products include Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access and Zscaler Private Access, each noted by 15% of the reviewers. These two solutions appear to be primary competitors, indicating a highly competitive landscape for secure network access. Beyond specific products, the Zscaler ecosystem, including Zscaler Internet Access and general mentions of the Zscaler brand, collectively represent a significant portion of the alternatives, with 11% of reviewers having experience with Zscaler Internet Access and another 11% referencing Zscaler broadly. Additionally, Citrix Workspace, encompassing its secure private access offerings, was cited by 7% of reviewers, suggesting its continued relevance in the market despite some mentions of discontinued versions. The consistent positive sentiment across these alternatives indicates that organizations are actively exploring and utilizing various robust solutions to meet their secure access requirements.

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access

Zscaler Private Access

Zscaler Private Access

Zscaler Internet Access

Zscaler Internet Access

What positive or negative impact (i.e. Return on Investment or ROI) has Cisco Secure Access had on your overall business objectives?

From 27 reviews | Last Published June 6, 2026

Cisco Secure Access has positively impacted organizations' business objectives, primarily by enhancing security posture and streamlining operations, according to a review sample of 27. A significant finding is the reported reduction in security risks and attack surfaces, cited by 19% of reviewers, who noted the product's ability to minimize potential damage from breaches and prevent access to malicious content. This security enhancement is often linked with improved operational efficiency, a benefit mentioned by 15% of reviewers, who highlighted cost consolidation and reduced data center complexity due to the solution's cloud-based nature. Furthermore, the platform has been instrumental in supporting remote workforces, with 11% of reviewers appreciating its seamless and secure access capabilities for SaaS applications and the internet. The simplified management interface and quick deployment were also noted by 11% of reviewers, contributing to ease of use for IT teams. Finally, the product's ability to address remote access and endpoint security challenges, including securing third-party AI solutions, was a positive impact for 7% of reviewers. Overall, the synthesis indicates a strong positive return on investment through enhanced security, operational gains, and effective remote work enablement.

Security Improvement

Reduced Security Risk and Attack Surface.

Operational Efficiency

Improved Operational Efficiency.

Remote Workforce Support

It offered us seamless and secure access to SaaS applications and the internet

Besides Cisco Secure Access, what other software do you regularly use? How likely would you be to recommend it to a friend or colleague?

From 27 reviews | Last Published June 6, 2026

Reviewers frequently mention other security software alongside Cisco Secure Access, indicating a common practice of integrating various tools within their security infrastructure. Among these, Cisco Secure Firewall is highlighted by 11% of reviewers, suggesting its established presence and complementary role within environments already utilizing Cisco solutions. Another notable solution is CrowdStrike Falcon, cited by 7% of reviewers, which points to the adoption of endpoint detection and response capabilities from specialized vendors. The pattern observed suggests that organizations often deploy a multi-layered security approach, combining network-level protection with endpoint security and other access management tools. This integration strategy aims to create a comprehensive defense posture, leveraging strengths from different security domains. The positive sentiment associated with these mentioned tools implies a general satisfaction with their performance and utility in enhancing overall security operations.

Cisco Secure Firewall

Cisco Secure Firewall

CrowdStrike Falcon

CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Management

Describe how you use Cisco Secure Access in your organization. What are the business problems the product addresses and what is the scope of your use case?

From 27 reviews | Last Published June 6, 2026

Cisco Secure Access is widely adopted by organizations primarily to establish secure remote and hybrid connectivity for various user populations, including employees, remote users, and business partners, accessing corporate applications, internet resources, and cloud workloads. This foundational role was highlighted by 26% of reviewers. The product addresses critical business problems by modernizing access solutions, replacing legacy VPNs, and consolidating fragmented security tools into a unified platform. Reviewers frequently describe its application in providing secure remote access for a mobile workforce, with 19% specifically mentioning its use for remote users and secure web proxy functions. Furthermore, 15% of reviewers noted its effectiveness in maintaining reliable and secure VPN connections, contributing to a more seamless user experience. The solution is also valued for its comprehensive Security Service Edge (SSE) and Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) capabilities, which are seen as crucial for securing connectivity regardless of user location or device.

Secure Remote/Hybrid Connectivity

Cisco Secure Access is deployed as the foundation for secure remote and hybrid connectivity across all user populations including employees, remote users, and business partners to corporate applications, internet resources, and cloud workloads.

Remote User Access

We utilize CSA for remote workers and secure web proxy

Secure VPN and Network Access

Cisco SA ensures a mobile workforce remains highly productive and safe from cyber threats.

Please provide some detailed examples of areas where Cisco Secure Access has room for improvement.

From 27 reviews | Last Published June 6, 2026

Reviews of Cisco Secure Access indicate several areas where the product could be enhanced, primarily revolving around integration, configuration, and user experience. The most frequently cited area for improvement, mentioned by 19% of reviewers, is the maturity and ease of integration with both Cisco's own product ecosystem and third-party solutions. This concern extends to specific issues like EDR integration and interoperability with firewalls. Beyond integration, several interconnected themes emerged, each noted by 11% of reviewers: the complexity of policy configuration, challenges with the user interface and navigation, limitations in certain feature functionalities, and difficulties in overall configuration and management. Reviewers suggest that simplifying policy creation and management, improving the dashboard's responsiveness and layout, and offering more granular control over specific features would significantly enhance the product experience. These observations suggest a collective desire for a more streamlined, intuitive, and seamlessly integrated security solution.

Integration with other products

Integration Maturity Across the Cisco Products.

Policy configuration complexity

Policy Configuration Complexity.

UI/UX Navigation

Sometimes it feels a little clunky and hard to find some things in the dashboard.

Please provide some detailed examples of things that Cisco Secure Access does particularly well.

From 27 reviews | Last Published June 6, 2026

Cisco Secure Access is frequently highlighted by reviewers for its comprehensive security capabilities and ease of deployment. A significant portion of the review base, 19% of reviewers, specifically commend its robust security features, noting its ability to consolidate various security controls like Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), Firewall-as-a-Service (FWaaS), and DNS security into a single solution. The platform's ease of use and setup also garnered positive feedback from 19% of the reviewers, who found the initial configuration and ongoing management straightforward. Furthermore, the product's effectiveness in providing secure remote access for employees is a recurring theme, cited by 11% of reviewers, enabling mobile workforces to maintain productivity while being protected from cyber threats. Reviewers also appreciate the unified dashboard, which offers a single pane of glass for managing services and reporting, mentioned by 11% of the sample. The web filtering capabilities, preventing access to restricted sites, were also positively noted by 11% of reviewers. These aspects collectively contribute to a perception of Cisco Secure Access as a capable and user-friendly tool for modern security challenges.

Security Features

Zero Trust Remote Access.

Ease of Use/Setup

Ease of setup

Unified Dashboard

I enjoy the single pane of glass for changes

Loading Reviews List....