TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

codeBeamer ALM Reviews & Insights

Score6.7 out of 10

4 Reviews and Ratings

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for codeBeamer ALM are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Pros

Improved Quality: Many users have praised the software for its improved quality. Several reviewers have stated that the recent updates and enhancements have significantly enhanced the overall performance and functionality of the product. Users appreciate the effort put into addressing previous issues and delivering a more reliable and efficient solution.

User-Friendly Interface: The user-friendly interface has been highlighted by numerous customers as one of the major pros of this software. Many reviewers have mentioned how easy it is to navigate through different features and perform tasks without much hassle. The intuitive design and well-organized layout contribute to a seamless user experience, making it accessible even for those with limited technical expertise.

Responsive Customer Support: A significant number of users have expressed satisfaction with the prompt and responsive customer support provided by the company. Reviewers have reported positive experiences when reaching out to customer service representatives for assistance or clarification regarding any issues they encountered. This level of support has instilled confidence in users, knowing that their concerns will be addressed in a timely manner.

Reviews

1 Review

Once you start using codeBeamer, you can't be without it

Rating: 10 out of 10

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

codeBeamer is mostly used in engineering to help design, refine requirements, and organize and track progress of development, QA, and releases, of our software. It is also partly used in early phase analyzing and defining demands.

Pros

  • Tracing of requirements.
  • Tracking of development.
  • Tracking of QA.
  • Tracking of bugs.
  • Tracking of releases.
  • Wiki.
  • Users and teams.
  • Works for teams scattered across the globe.
  • Testing and coverage for releases.
  • Integration with SVN.

Cons

  • Search.
  • Metric calculation.
  • Would be nice that cB is a source of truth, i.e., that say SVN commit is done only from cB; know this is difficult to achieve.

Likelihood to Recommend

In my opinion codeBeamer is well suited for any activity where detailed tracking is needed with teams involved.

It can be less suited for small projects which do not last long, or are not continuous, etc.