ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus Reviews & Insights

We use ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus to perform weekly vulnerability scans and identify the computers on our network that need to be upgraded or patched. We deploy all our software updates through ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus and we have set up the product to perform updates to a test group first and then once some time has passed we roll out the updates to the entire network.

ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus is highly effective for organizations prioritizing ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and a single pane of glass for both vulnerability detection and patching. It is well-suited for organizations needing to manage a diverse, yet traditional, on-premise IT infrastructure (servers, workstations, laptops). It is good at securing remote endpoints by using an agent to scan, detect and patch workstations. It is good for both scanning and remediating vulnerabilities through the built-in patching tools. It is ideal for a smaller to mid sized environment using Active Directory.

We are using ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus for patch management, system security, and vulnerability management. However, I am facing an issue with BIOS updates, as I am unable to update the BIOS automatically using ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus.
Is there any solution or workaround to resolve this issue? I would appreciate your guidance, as this tool is very useful for securing our organization’s systems.

Recently I have upgraded my ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus from very old version to new version. And I was faced so many issues but with the help of ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus support it si successfully implemented. Thanks team

Currently, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus helps me with Linux servers and keeps them up to date.

Better patch application.
Less application and/or improvement for Linux environments.

We currently use the Vulnerability solution to keep our servers up to date. Since its implementation, we have significantly reduced the time spent on overtime for applying updates, as well as decreased the number of vulnerabilities in our environment—many of which we didn’t even know existed. Today, I am particularly a big fan of this tool and have already recommended it to several colleagues in the field. Automation makes updates much faster and more reliable.

More appropriate: Server environment updates are extremely functional.
Less appropriate: Workstation updates, due to the cost.