Microsoft Sentinel Pricing

“We switched originally for cost reasons, specifically cost control, but I have found that the ability to create reports, the ability to integrate new data sources, et cetera, has been significantly... … We can focus on the actual incident response work and while the cost savings have not been as big as we had hoped for, it has been much easier to control those or to see why is something causing, why...”

“We are yet to see any ROI as we have not yet faced any security issues or wait, if we have not faced any security issues, this can be considered as an ROI.”

“This solution, which is excellent for confirming breach attempts, replaced expensive hardware that had expensive maintenance contracts and did not give thorough information.”

“this has replaced expensive hardware that had expensive maintenance contracts and didn't give the indepth reporting. … With everything moving to a pay per month per user plan it would be nice to have some rollup products that just included everything.”

“reduced cost occured for legacy system and saving 50000 dollar upto 1 year reduced false positive incidents up to 90 percent faster deployment over 100000 dollar up to 1 year.”

“As we don't use the egress data, but this could be a very expensive cloud cost for other organization out there The popularity is increasing but you might be ending up in vendor lock down.”

“So the saving will be a minor but will be a saving in the cost of your team.”

“We catch problems faster Everything is in one place Less manual work for the team Good return on investment.”

“Because of this feature Microsoft Sentinel becomes more expensive than its competitor.”

“Within a few days I did start seeing the return on investment.”

“In fact, it costs us money to get it to run, but it gave us a pre-value.”