Related Quote from Paresh Tupade
cloud basis and for advanced features or large enterprises. The pricing is affordable for such enterprises that need more security measures but the deployment
Microsoft Sentinel has 7 pricing edition(s), from $2.46 to $0. A free trial of Microsoft Sentinel is also available. Look at different pricing editions below and read more information about the product here to see which one is right for you.
Azure Sentinel$2.46Cloud per GB ingested | 100 GB per day$123.00Cloud per day | 200 GB per day$221.40Cloud per day | 300 GB per day$319.80Cloud per day |
400 GB per day$410.00Cloud per day | 500 GB per day$492.00Cloud per day | More than 500 GB per day$492.00 + $98.40Cloud per day/plus each additional 100 GB increment |
For the latest information on pricing, visit https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/business/get-started/start-free-trial
cloud basis and for advanced features or large enterprises. The pricing is affordable for such enterprises that need more security measures but the deployment
software has enabled us to cost save interms of purchase and implementation cost of the software as it is cheaper and affordable compared to its competitors … keeping our ICT Systems secure. The only issue with this product is high cost of implementation as it requires incredible infrastructure for its optimum … turning point in threat detection and response. Ai…
investigation and response to security incidents at machine speed. It lowers total cost of ownership.
ticketing system other third party app should also be compatible pricing better features for hybrid cloud … reduced cost occured for legacy system and saving 50000 dollar upto 1 year reduced false
also support for 3rd party connectors and CSPs such as Oracle Cloud. The cost of data ingestion for network logging is far too significant making this
and their cloud-based products. We switched originally for cost reasons, specifically cost control, but I have found that the ability to create reports … our jobs. We can focus on the actual incident response work and while the cost savings have not been as big as we had hoped for, it has been much easier … Defender for endpoint because storing the data i…
knows Microsoft and that the prebuilt alerting and detections will have value.
It's been average. We've chosen it because of the cost reduction.
While it works, not the most affordable option. … Sentinel. It has all the amazing features a business needs. However, it is not cheap.
downside that I would say that probably the most is comes along with the pricing model. There are some ways where it's not as competitive as some other vendors … we're getting out of our other product that we have. It's something if the pricing were to get right, then I'd…
and Normalization of cloud-based log sources provided by Microsoft Cheaper license cost compared to the traditional SIEMs. Interactive UI.
Price is on higher side as compared to competitive products Process of Onboarding
As we don't use the egress data, but this could be a very expensive cloud cost for other organization out there The popularity is increasing but … pay such cost, this will be somethi…
The solution can become very expensive when not used in an effective way The SOAR functionality can be more powerful … is an excellent product. Because of the integration it can be used pretty cost efficient and it works pretty good across the different products. This is … but…
from competitors. Because of this feature Microsoft Sentinel becomes more expensive than its competitor. We are yet to use this feature widely.
which is excellent for confirming breach attempts, replaced expensive hardware that had expensive maintenance contracts and did not give thorough information
can lose its effectiveness in non-Microsoft environments. It's not the most cost-effective solution out there. False positives are something that really needs
suited is going to be in small business environments just because of the cost of implementation.
this has replaced expensive hardware that had expensive maintenance contracts and didn't give the indepth reporting
Cost saving as you don't need to use multiple platforms to monitor your security