TrustRadius: an HG Insights company
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR Logo

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR Reviews and Ratings

Rating: 8.5 out of 10
Score
8.5 out of 10

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Business Problems Solved

Palo Alto Networks Traps is a highly regarded cybersecurity software that offers robust protection against malware, zero-day exploits, and advanced persistent threats. Its seamless integration with the Palo Alto Suite has made it a popular choice among users. The software can be easily installed and used on various devices, including laptops and virtual desktops. Users have praised Traps for its ability to detect grayware, serious malware, and exploit attempts that may be missed by other antivirus solutions like Windows Defender. One of the standout features of Traps is its ability to prevent the execution of malware without requiring a file to be downloaded, providing enhanced protection for users. This next-gen capability, coupled with its ease of use and strong protection, has prompted many customers to replace their existing antivirus solutions with Palo Alto Networks Traps.

Traps has proven itself invaluable in identifying and quarantining threats, as well as isolating future malware and preventing its spread across the network. By integrating Wildfire and host AV, Traps adds additional layers of security to hosts and aids in detecting unknown and zero-day malware. The inclusion of Traps functionality in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR further enhances security controls and provides deep visibility into suspicious activities and behaviors exhibited by users. Cortex XDR serves as an Endpoint Response tool that enables organizations to quickly identify and respond to events and incidents across multiple devices.

Users have reported that Palo Alto Networks Traps offers advanced anti-malware detection and prevention with a low false-positive rate, minimizing user annoyance while effectively mitigating the risk of malware attacks, zero-day attacks, and APTs. Its organization-wide deployment ensures comprehensive protection for servers, desktops, and roaming users. With Traps seamlessly integrated into the Palo Alto Suite, manual whitelisting and server updates are no longer necessary. Overall, Palo Alto Networks Traps is widely recognized for its ease of installation, seamless integration capabilities, next-gen features, and robust protection against advanced threats.

Reviews

13 Reviews

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR a Winner (if you can overcome the management interface)

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR is one of several layers we use to secure our endpoint devices. Harnessing the power of AI and machine learning, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR quickly recognizes and stops threats that may have otherwise gone unnoticed. It also offers the ability to remotely take systems offline while still giving you some level of access to perform forensics or repairs.

Pros

  • Endpoint Protection
  • Detect and Response
  • Antivirus

Cons

  • Interface can be confusing
  • An "Admin Bypass" feature to proceed with a false detection would be nice
  • Better out-of-the-box reporting

Likelihood to Recommend

In my opinion, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR is best suited for an enterprise environment that has a knowledgeable IT staff. The interface can be daunting and is easy to get lost under level after level. Although, they now offer "managed detection and response," where their experts monitor and report back 24/7, which could be a great choice for smaller businesses.

Vetted Review
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
3 years of experience

Palo Alto Cortex XDR is market leader

Rating: 9 out of 10

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Palo Alto Cortex XDR has excellent features which strengthen Security for Endpoint, Cloud and Firewall that can be integrated into a single solution. It has the capability for Digital Forensics and Ransomware Protection as well.

Pros

  • Antivirus Protection
  • Ransomware Protection
  • Digital Forensics
  • Endpoint Protection
  • Cloud Protection

Cons

  • Device Control
  • Drive Encryption

Likelihood to Recommend

Palo Alto Cortex XDR has excellent features which strengthen Security for Endpoint, Cloud, and Firewall that can be integrated into a single solution. It has the capability for Digital Forensics and Ransomware Protection as well. All devices control should be available. Drive Encryption process also should enable instead of Policy governing only.

Excellent Threat Hunting Capabilities And Endpoint Security Products For Next Gen

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

The trap was easy to install and worked well with the Palo Alto Suite overall. Upgrades are seamless because everything is in the cloud. We use traps on all of our devices, including laptops and virtual desktops. They did this to guard against malware, zero-day exploits, and APT attacks. This gives us the ability to triage/investigate right from the home page. It can disclose Gray ware and other serious malware and exploit attempts that Windows Defender misses. Palo Alto Networks Traps can also prevent the execution of malware that does not require a file to be downloaded. We’ll see in the CortexXDR product that Palo Alto Networks has added Traps functionality.

Pros

  • Some zero-day exploits, malicious child processes, and maliciously hashed files have been successfully blocked by it.
  • Analyzing and identifying unknown malicious software on workstations, servers, and mobile devices are made easier with the help of tracking file behavior.
  • Panorama's integration helps us detect malicious files and traps more quickly and efficiently than other products we've tried, protecting us from zero-day attacks.

Cons

  • Traps, like all advanced endpoint protection, need to grow in machine learning/baseline protection.
  • Sometimes, exceptions were made because of legacy or custom software issues, and we encountered a bug in an older version of the agent.
  • Traps are best for IT environments using COTS reports/dashboards. In environments where custom software and applications are used, Traps necessitate a great deal of tweaking.

Likelihood to Recommend

Malware that doesn’t leave files behind has become widely available. Anyone who can afford to reverse this trend should purchase technology. Application whitelisting isn’t for everyone, and Palo Alto Networks Traps can help. Enterprises looking for a low-affected, next-generation solution with high protection should consider it. PAN Traps is a great product at a reasonable price, and I highly recommend it.

Endpoint Response Where It Matters

Rating: 9 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

XDR is being used as an Endpoint Response tool. As an EDR we are able to identify events and logs across multiple devices. The nodes on the network display a variety of information that help analyst understand behaviors in the environment. XDR address the problem of security analysts being able to discover, detect, and respond events or incidents involving hosts on the network.

Pros

  • Direct Access to devices via Live Terminal which provides operations with scripting, triage, and preservation of artifacts.
  • Behavioral Indicators of Compromise which provides alerts on events regarding groups of hosts and their signatures.
  • Querying complex data sets involving a variety of devices for network connections, hashes, DNS, etc.

Cons

  • The UI loads a large amount of data from each windows pane requiring users to scroll or modify queries for smaller list of results. The data being presented can be overwhelming and alerting does not always indicate IOCs.
  • Performance on XDR tends to fluctuate when running queries and features available don't make the process of hunting any faster.
  • Support for the product needs improvement as the product is newer more items are revealed that require attention or resolution.

Likelihood to Recommend

In a scenario where EDR is a requirement or necessity XDR performs well with or without a SIEM. There are millions of events and logs to parse through and XDR is capable of handling the large load. On top of the large data that is being parsed, features such as Live Terminal, File Retrieval, OS support, and general Metrics, the tool has room to grow and provide a lot for a Security team or organization. Incident Response is a great example of how XDR can shine.

Vetted Review
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
2 years of experience

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR--best fit as an endpoint protection suite

Rating: 9 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR is used for our in-house as well as roaming users, and we have procured around 200 licenses. With Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, we are enabling security controls and also getting insights and deep visibility on our users' suspicious activities and behaviors and securing them from advanced attacks like file-less malware, ransomware, etc.

Pros

  • Malware prevention
  • Exploit prevention
  • EDR and XDR
  • Ransomware protection
  • Disk encryption (with Bit Locker and File Vault)
  • Device control features
  • Analytics
  • Investigation
  • Incident management
  • Forensics
  • NTA--network traffic analysis
  • UBA/UEBA--user entity behavior analysis

Cons

  • Inventory management
  • Web controls
  • DLP features

Likelihood to Recommend

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR is best suited for all the scenarios, except for OT or for devices that don't have internet connectivity. Especially for in-house or on-premises users, servers, roaming users, users working from home, or even users using their own devices, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR can be the best fit as an endpoint protection suite and even as a replacement of current AV.

Review of Palo Alto Networks Traps

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Palo Alto Networks Traps is used across the whole organization.

Pros

  • Enforce endpoint security
  • Anti-malware protection
  • Anti-virus protection

Cons

  • Automation and orchestration of Palo Alto Networks Traps agents either via the Endpoint Security Manager or via any automation platforms like Ansible, Python, etc.
  • Support of Palo Alto Networks Traps agents via REST APIs

Likelihood to Recommend

Palo Alto Networks Traps is very suited for Endpoint/Server detection and response.

Vetted Review
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
8 years of experience

Traps/Cortex XDR Review

Rating: 1 out of 10

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Traps/now Cortex XDR was being used to provide endpoint protection for our servers and desktops. Traps/Cortex XDR was being used organization wide.

Pros

  • It does nothing well

Cons

  • Traps/cortex XDR alerts on wide scale commercial apps that are clearly not malicious
  • the Cortex XDR console interface is 5 steps worse than simply bad
  • Frontline support reps are not fluent in spoken English although their written fluency is okay (at best)

Likelihood to Recommend

If I could give a zero, I would. This is a [bad] product with a bad interface. Support is awful and the product doesn't even come close to living up to the sales pitch. Avoid.

Traps is advanced malware protection without the hassle.

Rating: 9 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

It is important to note that the functionality of Palo Alto Network Traps is being subsumed into the larger CortexXDR product. Traps has been a good way for our organization to implement advanced anti-malware detection and prevention with a low false-positive rate and a minimum of user annoyance. It is able to catch things that are missed by Windows Defender, both grayware and more serious malware, and exploit attempts. Palo Alto Network Traps can even prevent file-less malware from running.

Pros

  • Malware detection without existing signatures
  • Test detonation of unknown files in the cloud and locally
  • Prevention of threats that traditional AV can't block

Cons

  • Deployment of the agent via SCCM can have downstream consequences.
  • The agent installer occasionally has issues, especially if it is being used for a manual upgrade.
  • Kernel permissions issues on Mac may require user interaction (true for most AV).

Likelihood to Recommend

Normal levels of antivirus are basically good enough at the free tier. But they won't stop the sorts of threats that are becoming increasingly common online. Even if one isn't the target of an APT, file-less malware is becoming commoditized and anyone who can afford it should implement a technology to stop it. Folks who aren't ready for full-on application whitelisting (including scripts) will find Palo Alto Network Traps a great fit with the relative ease of configuration and low user annoyance rate.

Vetted Review
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
4 years of experience

Palo Alto Network Traps make endpoint security simple

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We had previously used a local server-based agent before Traps. We have a Palo Alto firewall with subscriptions to URL filtering, Wildfire, and threat prevention so the systems were separated. Traps was an incredibly easy install that integrates with the rest of the Palo Alto Suite. I no longer have to whitelist our old agent and update that server. Everything is cloud-based so updates are seamless.

Pros

  • Cloud-based.
  • Simple to install.

Cons

  • Email alerts when issues are found not just a daily summary report.

Likelihood to Recommend

Great for employees that have devices off-site frequently. Easy for a small IT staff to use. Integrates great with the rest of Palo Alto. Works great for Windows and Macs.

Vetted Review
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
1 year of experience

Trap that malware!

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Traps was purchased as a response to a virus outbreak that kept cropping up due to still infected systems popping up days or weeks after we deemed the environment clean. It's being used across the entire organization currently and helped us identify that threat, quarantine it and also helps isolate future malware from spreading across the network.

Pros

  • Traps does a fantastic job at stopping malware before it executes
  • Traps defends against 0 day attacks better than other products we have tried
  • Traps isolates malware to that particular host better than any A/V we've tried

Cons

  • Traps doesn't seem to function as a traditional A/V very well, so it's better as another layer to your endpoint protection
  • Traps can cause issues with some legacy or custom programs, so exceptions may have to be made
  • Traps falsely identifies things as malicious at times, this is not often though

Likelihood to Recommend

Traps is a fantastic tool for malware prevention and works great alongside traditional A/V. Integration with other Palo Alto gear is also very nice, as it can tap into other products/tools for enhanced functionality. Traps is great at quarantining malicious code to a single source and stops the spread of malware that uses network shares to spread very well.

Vetted Review
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
1 year of experience