PA Virtual NGFW what I think about it
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
virtual NGFW address the hardware footprint issue which help us and our customer to provision site pre-requisites to host a appliance based firewall like rack/power space/operation overheads etc. it extend the flexibility to accommodate this NGFW in hybrid infra environment.
Pros
- it helps putting policies based on application and not only port or IP
- it provide all the features and functionality with the flexibility of virtual footprint, so scalability is not a challenge.
- comparatively easy to implement policies like SAML for SSo etc.
- well suited for a SSE environment,
- overall reliability is good for a virtual NGF of PAL, we used multiple models on VMxx
Cons
- I think if we can do a better on resource requirement like vCPU, Memory etc. it is a bit higher side versus the competition.
- can we simply the licenses like BYOC or PAYG.
- can we see some development to have features like policy as code for cloud native requirement. it can be better from current situation
Likelihood to Recommend
VM based NGFW from PAN give us similar strong NGFW platform in virtual footprint to address some of hybrid scenarios of the customer where they have on-premise and cloud environment. specially where it is hard to get the appliance based solution. different licensing model give us flexibility to leverage the PAN licensing.
