The best service for reducing AWS computing costs
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
ProsperOps simply requires the least privileged level of access, which provides us peace of mind and dependability. Passive monitoring of our computing resources does not necessitate the use of any agents, and the cost analysis is handled by a simple IAM role. Because of this, we don't have to worry about ProsperOps' access privileges impacting our application's performance or posing a security risk.
Pros
- The arbitrage strategy is effective. It's hard to believe how good the service is.
- It is a plug-and-forget approach for ProsperOps.
- It costs ProsperOps a percentage of the savings they make.
Cons
- The inclusion of RDS and Elasticache in cost management is something I'd be all for.
- When it comes to EC2 capacity reservations, ProsperOps only includes reserved instances in the region where we are located.
Likelihood to Recommend
Our firm spends the majority of its cloud budget on EC2 instances, Fargate deployments, and Lambda executions. Automated modifications to discount portfolios based on changes in workloads allow ProsperOops to handle our shifting workloads with ease. In order to meet our net cloud budget requirements, it always follows a high-quality SP (Savings Plan) Portfolio management strategy.
