Related Quote from Mauricio E Gleizer
ArcGIS is extremely expensive, especially for small businesses. The QGIS learning curve is smoother.
QGISFreeOn Premise |
ArcGIS is extremely expensive, especially for small businesses. The QGIS learning curve is smoother.
local government/municipalities who are our clients, as a functional and cost-effective replacement for other proprietary GIS packages. By reducing licensing … We've used MapInfo, but it is expensive and lacks the wide support that QGIS has. It also doesn't slot in that … also eval…
to learn or find a way through solving a business problem using QGIS is a cost we have to pay.
We explored ArcGIS a bit and realized that we couldn't afford this approach. We fully realize it's a more complete product offering, but … were able to do online mapping using QGIS exports and Mapbox.com for much cheaper than using ESRI.
organization's mission and views on children and adolescent health. This is a low cost/free option for us to create reports and tools for grantors and funders, … QGIS is a great alternative to expensive GIS software for non-profits and new users who are looking to enhance their … data visual…
that has been strengthening over the years. It is not necessary to pay an expensive license to use all the options that it offers us and that is a great benefit … needs of certain users. A big advantage of QGIS is undoubtedly the economic cost, because Qgis is a software almost…
having access to the various commercial tools I used while at university. The value of being able to "keep" my work with open formats and free tools cannot be … license to use. I now own my data, and the tools to refine it further, with no cost to myself. QGIS has a large…
financial hunger. In this case, instead of spending a lot of money for buying expensive software, it would be better to use free, open sourced solutions, just … QGIS vs. ArcGIS. The main reason is the price of ArcGIS. Most of the functionality is identical in both products,…