CheckPoint is good bang for buck
Updated November 14, 2025
CheckPoint is good bang for buck

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with CheckPoint
Our organisation uses CheckPoint as the secondary layer in our network security architecture, serving as the internal firewall. It operates as the intermediary between our external edge firewall and the internal network, providing an additional layer of protection for applications, systems, and websites. This setup ensures that all inbound and outbound traffic passing through the perimeter is subject to further inspection and policy enforcement before reaching internal resources. By doing so, CheckPoint helps to strengthen our overall cybersecurity posture, prevent unauthorised access, and maintain greater control over internal communications and data flow within the organisation.
Pros
- Rules
- Gui
- Updates and patches
- Communication from Sales Team
Cons
- Management console can be complex
- Reporting Logs hard to manage
- Integration with Cloud apps
- Support is fantastic
- Limitations on integration with 3rd party apps
- Units and support are well priced
- The option for Virtual appliances is a big cost saving
- Cisco 1000 Series Integrated Services Routers (ISR 1000)
The CheckPoint Firewall and Cisco ISR router serve different purposes. Our organisation uses both devices, but in different areas of the topology. The Cisco ISR is a remote device and its function is to relay information to our edge firewall, which then passes to our internal firewall (CheckPoint) to securely control traffic requests.
Do you think CheckPoint delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with CheckPoint's feature set?
Yes
Did CheckPoint live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of CheckPoint go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy CheckPoint again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation