Repeatable Server Configuration and Deployment
Overall Satisfaction with Chef
Chef is not an enterprise-wide tool. We use Chef within our department for the configuration management of our numerous servers. Even though we only have a small number of different types of servers, the configuration of hundreds of servers can be unwieldy. Having a standard recipes for a database server or reporting server has helped us to have a more consistent deployment. This helps when deploying new virtual machines, and helps with our speed to market.
Pros
- System Configuration Recipes.
- Configuration Management.
Cons
- The recipe language could be a little more robust.
- Less time is spent troubleshooting configuration errors.
- From the first time we see correct deployment of servers.
We found that Chef was easy to use, and we liked the whole concept of recipes and cookbooks. We were using the concept of recipes and cookbooks for our SQL development, so Chef was a natural fit for our team members and environment. That whole paradigm is easy for everyone to understand. The language to write the recipes wasn't too difficult to master either.
Do you think Progress Chef delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Progress Chef's feature set?
Yes
Did Progress Chef live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Progress Chef go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Progress Chef again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation