Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure
I help other companies implement Cisco ACI at their data center. From design to implementation and support. Mainly Cisco ACI is used by the IT-department. Cisco ACI solves/helps solve SDN in the data centers, and it really helps with faster deployments of services in the data centers.
- High-Speed DC networking.
- Extremely well suited for automation.
- Simple to add new switches in the DC.
- The GUI needs to be simpler, it is good but many fields don't need to be filled in.
- Faster implementation of new networks in the DC.
- Fewer faults in the DC, both on networking and the server.
Using Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure
5 - We are all consultants who help the customer design and implement Cisco ACI in their DC.
5 - The learning curve is steep when you start with ACI, but it's really worth it when you start to grasp the concepts behind ACI.
The typical consultant who designs and implements ACI is good in routing, switching and some security.
The typical consultant who designs and implements ACI is good in routing, switching and some security.
- SDN in the DC.
- Automation.
Evaluating Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure and Competitors
Not Sure
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Vendor Reputation
Customers want the automation feature, and as Cisco ACI is built around the open Rest API. It is supremely suited for this task.
Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure Implementation
- Third-party professional services
I am a consultant at Conscia Netsafe, so I'm one of the guys doing the implementation at the customer site.
Yes -
- Design.
- PoC.
- implementation.
- Test/verification.
- Connection of legacy DC network and Cisco ACI.
- Migration of servers, firewalls, load balancers, etc into Cisco ACI.
- Migration of DC-networking into Cisco ACI.
- Segmentation of DC-networks, creating files for how the EPGs are allowed to communicate (mostly done with Contracts in Cisco ACI but also done in external firewall).
Change management was a big part of the implementation and was well-handled
- Hitting BUGs.
- Insufficient training of network engineers.
Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved Kept well informed No escalation required Immediate help available Support cares about my success Quick Initial Response | None |
Yes - Our customers do, most of them buy solution support for the controllers (APIC) and that way they can have total coverage of anything in ACI and integrated systems like VMware, Kubernetes, etc.
Yes - Yes
Every time i open a case with Cisco, which is not often, i always get exceptional support from the TAC-engineers.
Using Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Well integrated Consistent Convenient Feel confident using | Requires technical support Lots to learn |
- Deploying multiple servers with the same networking config.
- Integrating VMware, Kubernetes, etc
- Automation of DC networking.