Why AHV ?
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Compute Hyperconverged with Nutanix
Mainly as a on prem or colo setup combined with either AHV or VMware hypervisors (customers like the AHV alternative)
Pros
- Private cloud in the 500-2500 VM range
- K8S on top of these
- Traditional workloads on these as well
- Flexibility and scalability to start reasonably small and scale up quite big
Cons
- Multi site with DR and BC scenarios
- Moving into AI and or specialized workloads (but this is coming soon already)
- This is difficult to see yet, but the expectation is that the hypervisor licensing can be better (cost effective) with AHV
- The other advantage is the ease of migration (and expected cost)
Do you think Cisco Compute Hyperconverged with Nutanix delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Cisco Compute Hyperconverged with Nutanix's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Compute Hyperconverged with Nutanix live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Compute Hyperconverged with Nutanix go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Compute Hyperconverged with Nutanix again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation