Cisco Viptela SDWAN
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco SD-WAN
We are using Cisco SD-WAN across Canada for KPMG and with the Cisco SD-WAN we are automating the configurations with Templates and API calls. It actually helps to secure and provision the sites with less time interval. The main purpose is Automation and assurance with the overlay concept of OMP protocol and the DIA with On-Ramp looks like a strong product portfolio.
Pros
- Automation
- Assurance
- DIA
- On-Ramp
- Next generation Networks
Cons
- SD-AVC
- integration third party
- Secure WAN
- Application Visibility
- Automation
- SASE
- Secure Segmentation
- Single pane of Glass
- ROI
Cisco SD-WAN solution supports network micro-segmentation and identity-based policy management across Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) and non-SD-Access branches. We are using SD-Access in all our branches and SDWAN on the WAN side, making an end-to-end solution for LAN and WAN. Integration between these solution makes much simple to test, troubleshoot and get support from a single vendor. I would always go with the end-to-end solution which makes us select Cisco SD-WAN rather than another vendor.
Do you think Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation