Lost Edits Unclear Answers and a Refund Framed as a Courtesy.
January 25, 2026

Lost Edits Unclear Answers and a Refund Framed as a Courtesy.

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 1 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Descript

We use Descript to produce training and support videos for our business. Our workflow is: record screen and voice, transcribe the audio, then edit the transcript and timeline to clean up mistakes, remove pauses, and tighten the content. We also apply effects like background blur, background removal, noise removal, and Eye Contact to improve quality.
The main business problems Descript is meant to solve for us are speed and consistency. It lets us turn raw recordings into polished videos faster than traditional editors, and it helps us maintain a repeatable process across many videos created by different team members. The scope is multiple projects per month, managed in shared folders/drives, with a team member (assistant/editor) doing most of the edits and others reviewing and exporting final versions.

Pros

  • Easy to turn a screen recording into an edited video quickly.
  • Projects are easy to open from anywhere, share with others for review, and keep organized in folders/drives without sending large video files back and forth.
  • The built-in cleanup and enhancement tools are helpful for fast polishing, like noise removal and background tools.

Cons

  • Reliability and data safety need improvement. We had projects edited months earlier that later appeared as raw recordings, and support could not recover the edits. Descript should provide stronger guarantees that edits are saved, retained, and recoverable.
  • Support and incident handling should be stronger. When users report missing edits, support should provide clear root-cause explanations, better tools to trace project history, and a fairer remediation process when work is lost.
  • Poor customer service and engineering.
  • We had projects edited months earlier that later appeared as raw recordings, and support could not recover the edits. That caused major rework risk and lost time. We paused production during the investigation, which delayed content delivery and created extra cost.
  • The time savings only matter if the work is safe and recoverable. In our case, the loss of edits (plus the hours paid to an editor) outweighed the subscription value. What we lost is way more than a few years of subscription, but they only settled for a month's refund, saying it is already a courtesy.
  • Descript helped us publish training and support videos faster by letting us edit through text and do quick cleanup in one place. When it works, it reduces editing time and makes it easier to keep content moving without needing multiple tools.
The editing experience is easy when everything works. Transcript editing, basic effects, and cloud access are convenient and help move quickly.
But our experience showed a serious weakness in long-term reliability. Videos edited around May appeared raw when we accessed them in December. Cuts and effects were missing, and support could not recover the edits. That kind of failure makes the tool hard to rely on for real business work, because it creates rework risk and uncertainty. The support responses also did not fully explain the mismatch we saw with backups and project state. For a tool used to save time, losing work cancels out the convenience.

Do you think Descript delivers good value for the price?

No

Are you happy with Descript's feature set?

Yes

Did Descript live up to sales and marketing promises?

No

Did implementation of Descript go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Descript again?

No

Descript is well-suited for fast editing of training videos, tutorials, podcasts, and screen recordings, where transcript-based editing and quick cleanup save time. It works best when you need a simple workflow to record, transcribe, remove filler words, tighten sections, and apply basic enhancement tools like noise cleanup.
It is less appropriate for high-stakes projects where losing edits would be very costly, or when you need strong guarantees around long-term project history, backups, and recovery. Based on our experience, if you are doing many hours of edits and expect to revisit projects months later, you may want an additional export/archive process outside the platform.

Descript Support

We had a very frustrating experience with Descript and their support.

We used Descript to record and edit several videos. The edits were done around May, mainly using the web app. When we opened those same projects in December, many of them looked like raw recordings again. Cuts were missing and effects were missing.

Support and engineering told us they checked their logs and only saw “creation → recording → transcription,” and they said they could not find proof the edits were ever made. That explanation does not match what we saw in the app. The affected videos show two project backup files. In Descript, backups only appear after you start editing (the app even says so). But when we checked other projects that we know are raw, those do not show any backup files. We asked a simple question: if backups appear only after editing, why do the “raw” affected videos have two backups while truly raw videos have none? They did not answer this clearly.

One rep also said they noticed a spike in network errors in May. That is exactly when the edits were done, which makes it very likely the edits did not save or sync correctly. Instead of admitting this could be the cause, support kept pointing to “no logs of edits” and that it was our fault.

They refunded one month, but called it a “courtesy.” That was disappointing. We also stopped using Descript while they were investigating because we did not feel it was safe to keep working in the platform. If that one-month refund was meant to cover the time we could not use the service during the investigation, that still does not address the real damage. We lost many hours of work, we paid our editor hourly, and we paid for the subscription for convenience and reliability. For the amount of inconvenience and loss we experienced, one month is clearly not enough.
ProsCons
None
Slow Resolution
Poor followup
Less knowledgeable
Problems left unsolved
Not kept informed
Escalation required
Difficult to get immediate help
Need to explain problems multiple times
Support doesn't seem to care
Slow Initial Response
No. We did not purchase premium support because we expected standard support to be sufficient for a paid product. We were escalated to a lead/manager and engineering, but the issue was still not fixed. The responses largely blamed us and did not clearly answer the key questions we raised. It also felt like our questions were avoided, even though the details pointed to a problem on the app or syncing side. In our view, premium support should mainly change response time and ease of access, not the quality of investigation or the willingness to provide clear answers.
Yes - It is the same incident when I reached out to their customer service. They brushed off our points and just kept telling us it was our fault, not their app.
No. I never experienced exceptional support from them. I always feel like they do not love what they are doing.

Comments

More Reviews of Descript