From Websense to Forcepoint
Overall Satisfaction with Forcepoint Web Security
We have selected Forcepoint for filtering our data flows on web browsing traffic. Its capabilities are scaled and availability is ensured with the high availability option. Load balancing is handled by WCCP. It's transparent proxy implementation.
Pros
- Its most valuable aspect is the efficient, immediate support.
- Works seamlessly very well on SSL interception and packet deep inspection
- Gives very flexible and most restrictive options in threat mitigation
- Stripping scripts from webpages helps fight drive-by, dropper, and cryptic common threats flood.
- It's very helpful in creating policies to block and safeguard from content and categories that are culturally and regionally sensitive.
Cons
- I would like to see improvement in Triton Manager response and resource consumption.
- Without Forcepoint Web Security the threat level would be extremely high specially if ransomware takes over. It would cost us roughly half a million dollars a day.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation