How IBM watsonx.ai changed our predictive gain
Overall Satisfaction with IBM watsonx.ai
We use IBM watsonx.ai to build, fine tune and deploy AI models that directly impact how we plan routes and manage fleet efficiency. We replaced our previous multiple standalone scripts that didn't communicate as well with a centralized IBM watsonx.ai environment.
Pros
- Autoprompt and tuning studio
- A built in governance checking system
- Its efficiency at training custom models
Cons
- It's currently so hard to visualize trends beyond basic plots
- Integration with non-IBM ML frameworks is quite patchy
- Model retraining times have gone down, we can now refresh models twice as often as we used to
- The model generated alerts reduce last minute reassignments
Integration with watsonx data. I can pull massive freight archives straight into training without juggling scripts or separate pipelines.
I can now fine tune large models directly on our internal logistics data without exporting anything outside our secure environment.
Do you think IBM watsonx.ai delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with IBM watsonx.ai's feature set?
Yes
Did IBM watsonx.ai live up to sales and marketing promises?
No
Did implementation of IBM watsonx.ai go as expected?
No
Would you buy IBM watsonx.ai again?
Yes
IBM watsonx.ai Feature Ratings
Using IBM watsonx.ai
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Easy to use Well integrated Feel confident using | Requires technical support Slow to learn Lots to learn |
- Aligning data and adjusting model parameters. Normally that would take days scripting and monitoring in Jupyter, but with watson ai studio, we kind of just set the constraints and let it run with minimal babysitting.
- Model explainability. IBM advertises solid governance tools, which they do have but if you want deeper interpretability, the native tools feel shallow
Yes, but I don't use it


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation