Easy to use solidly integrated OS.
Overall Satisfaction with macOS
We use macOS (and the associated iOS, iPadOS, tvOS, watchOS, and visionOS) because it is the operating system supplied for Apple devices used by our faculty and staff. For the most part, faculty choose the platform that best aligns with their teaching mission or the industry they are preparing students for. Macs are heavily used in the College of Arts and Letters, the College of Engineering, and the College of Science. They are also used by administrative personnel in several academic departments. The students at the university as a whole are about 60% Mac users, and an even higher percentage of iPhone and iPad users.
Pros
- Easy to use user interface.
- Integrated artificial intelligence features.
- Excellent media support.
- Excellent graphic support.
- Hardware and software are very well integrated.
- Built-in security features.
- Very customizable.
Cons
- Intrusiveness of security features is sometimes detrimental.
- "Apple tax" (premium pricing).
- Integration with open source and public domain development.
- Strictly limited to Apple hardware.
- macOS and associated hardware have a very long service life compared to other platforms, providing a low total cost of ownership.
- macOS is lower-maintenance than Windows and much lower-maintenance than Linux distros, thus reducing the need for expert support.
- Choice of operating environment aids in talent retention.
- Students primarily use Macs/MacOS, accounting for about 60% of our overall student population. Fully supporting this platform leads to better responses from applicants.
- macOS is seen as modern, which has an impact in all recruiting and retention areas.
- macOS requires very little troubleshooting.
macOS is much more user-friendly and designed for the novice user. Linux, while providing excellent performance, is not a system that regular non-expert users feel comfortable with out of the box. Windows is more complicated to support because it must accommodate a wide variety of manufacturers' hardware, down to motherboards. macOS has a very well-defined set of hardware to support, and it is very well integrated. It is just simpler to use and simpler to support than the alternatives.
Do you think macOS delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with macOS's feature set?
Yes
Did macOS live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of macOS go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy macOS again?
Yes
macOS Feature Ratings
Evaluating macOS and Competitors
- Scalability
- Integration with Other Systems
- Ease of Use
- Other
macOS is simply the only operating system choice for Apple Macintosh hardware. It is supplied without cost by the vendor, and updates/upgrades are free as well. But there is a strong preference on campus for macOS in certain areas, and a general satisfaction with it across campus and across departments.
There isn't really anything to change, Macintosh hardware comes with macOS included and pre-installed. There really isn't a process to select the OS so much as there is to select the hardware, and there are definite alignment preferences in certain areas and with certain users with the macOS and Apple ecosphere.
Using macOS
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- Application use.
- Graphical based work.
- Network access and web use.
- Backups
- Interfacing with external devices.
- Cross-compatibility with equipment designed for Windows.
Yes - The closest thing to an answer to this question would be that mobile devices have iOS, iPadOS, tvOS, and so forth, which are derivations of macOS for portable devices. It's not that macOS has a mobile interface, it's more that the mobile devices have a macOS-like operating system, which makes moving between devices easy and smooth.

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation