MAS200 was a good solution for SMBs
December 19, 2014
MAS200 was a good solution for SMBs
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Software Version
MAS200 version
Modules Used
- AR, AP, GL, SO, PO, IM, BoM
Overall Satisfaction with Sage 100 ERP
We use the software across the entire organization. It serves as the organization's general ledger as well as provides functionality for billing, sales and customer management, procurement and vendor management, and inventory control.
The initial issue that prompted the switch to MAS200 was needing the functionality of a Windows based accounting package. This made employees more productive compared to the terminal based solution previously used.
The initial issue that prompted the switch to MAS200 was needing the functionality of a Windows based accounting package. This made employees more productive compared to the terminal based solution previously used.
Pros
- Tremendous value for the cost of the solution
- Increased visibility into order fulfillment for client facing employees
- Integration with third party applications to facilitate fulfillment
Cons
- Introducing a web-based "inventory advisor" is a nice step, but Sage 100 would be far more effective as a web-based semi-real-time ERP. Would help better support fulfillment and light manufacturing.
- On an older version of the application, our team had trouble posting invoices when sales orders were being accessed.
- Most of our team was self-taught on the application, reducing how well we could use the application. Our perception was that additional training and support was not available.
- Increased employee efficiency
- Better customer service through the RMA module
- Improved planning and allocation through data mining
- MS Dynamics GP
We preferred the cost point and overall value we felt we got as opposed to the competition
Sage 100 ERP Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Yes - We used a phased implementation. Step one was to set up the GL/AP/AR and Inventory pieces. We implemented Customer Master and Sales functionality next. After that we included the service piece and improved tracking of product builds through bill of materials. Subsequent to implementation, we tinkered with different modules, but didn't add anything beyond the core we wanted from the get go.
Change management was minimal
- Delays. We had an initial timeframe of three months and it pushed to nearly eight.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation