Overall Satisfaction with Veracode
We use Veracode for security application scanning of our product. We also use Veracode as our manual penetration testing vendor. It is a critical part of our security hardening and validation processes.
- Regular application scanning
- MPT has been excellent and cost-effective
- The organization, from rep to executives, have proactively listened to our needs.
- Don't currently support our language for static analysis
- Would be nice if Veracode had network scanning as well.
- MPT costs have become more predictable
- Veracode Scanning and MPTs are key components of our security auditing and make it easier to pass client IPsec reviews.
- Qualys Web Application Scanning (WAS)
I have grown to trust Veracode more, ever since they released their Dynamic Scanning which can be set up as a regularly scheduled scan. We have also started to depend on Veracode as our MPT vendor as well. Finally, I've appreciated opportunities to talk with Veracode executives, leading to product improvements as well as insights for me about what is coming in the Veracode roadmap.
Qualys has more cumbersome support and their products are too complicated to use. Product teams are not very customer-centric. Company seems oriented towards much larger customers than I am. Still have to use them for Network Scanning but I would be willing to consider a Veracode offering if they had one.
Qualys has more cumbersome support and their products are too complicated to use. Product teams are not very customer-centric. Company seems oriented towards much larger customers than I am. Still have to use them for Network Scanning but I would be willing to consider a Veracode offering if they had one.
Do you think Veracode delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Veracode's feature set?
Yes
Did Veracode live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Veracode go as expected?
No
Would you buy Veracode again?
Yes