Citrix DaaSFormerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops / XenDesktop & XenApp
Overview
What is Citrix DaaS?
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops, or XenDesktop) is a virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) and application virtualization solution from Citrix.
Citrix Virtual Apps & Desktops : an ideal virtual desktop and application experience
The fastest way to use your apps
Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops
Good virtual product, easy to use an manage.
Cittrix Virtual Apps Review from an Internet Entrepreneur
Fully reccommend this Great Tool
Honest Review
Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops Remote Work
Citrix - you got it all in one applications access
Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops bring Virtual to the next level
Citrix Virtual Apps is great for users
XenDesktop thoughts found here
Let's move to virtual office with Citrix Virtual App
Best use case for Citrix Virtual Apps
Citrix for small business
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Pricing
Virtual Apps
$375
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Product Demos
Service continuity support for Android devices
Service continuity support for browsers (Workspace for Web)
Instructional Demo - Steps to cloud migration
Product Details
- About
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is Citrix DaaS?
With Citrix DaaS, IT can seamlessly deploy and manage hybrid work environments to increase business agility and deliver an enhanced user experience at scale. Built-in Citrix high-definition HDX technologies increase productivity, providing real-time network and performance optimization for even the most demanding 3D, voice, or video applications. Enhanced security and policy controls protect sensitive data to securely deliver vital resources anywhere to any device.
Citrix DaaS Competitors
Citrix DaaS Technical Details
Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
---|---|
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(155)Community Insights
- Business Problems Solved
Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops, previously known as XenApp and XenDesktop, have been widely adopted by organizations for a variety of use cases. Users have found that this software provides seamless access to virtualized desktops and applications across multiple satellite locations, enabling teams to work collaboratively and efficiently. It has also been deployed in data centers, supporting various clients and applications including published desktops and development applications.
One of the key benefits of Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops is its ability to facilitate remote work. Many organizations have relied on this software to provide their employees with secure access to desktops and applications from anywhere, ensuring business continuity even in challenging circumstances such as during the Covid-19 pandemic. Call center agents, testing teams, and general remote workers have leveraged this solution to maintain a strong security posture while enjoying a good user experience. Contractors, consultants, and remote workers have also found secure remote access through Citrix Virtual Apps valuable for their specific needs.
Another noteworthy use case of Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops is its ability to provide remote desktop access to applications and servers, reducing infrastructure costs and eliminating the need for a dedicated data center. By giving users the flexibility to connect to business applications, utilities, and production servers remotely, the software streamlines IT operations while cutting down on maintenance efforts. Moreover, it has proven beneficial for organizations handling sensitive data or those seeking to provide offshore developers with secure access to internal company resources.
Overall, Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops have addressed the diverse needs of businesses across industries. From ensuring seamless collaboration between distributed teams to enabling secure remote access to critical resources, this software has become an integral part of many organizations' IT infrastructure. Its ability to provide fast connections, improve efficiency, reduce costs, and enhance productivity has made it a preferred solution for various use cases within enterprises globally.
Attribute Ratings
- 8.2Likelihood to Renew4 ratings
- 8.4Availability2 ratings
- 7.4Performance4 ratings
- 8.2Usability6 ratings
- 7.9Support Rating8 ratings
- 8.3Online Training2 ratings
- 10In-Person Training1 rating
- 9Implementation Rating4 ratings
- 8.4Configurability2 ratings
- 9.2Product Scalability2 ratings
- 2.4Ease of integration4 ratings
- 7Vendor pre-sale2 ratings
- 5.2Vendor post-sale2 ratings
Reviews
(1-4 of 4)WhatsApp; it's XenApp!!!
- Remote accessibility is a huge plus with users on various devices that are supported. i.e. PC's, tablets, smart phones (most makes/versions)
- Implementation; allowing access without the need to install software on a users device. Once requested permissions are granted and the user can start pretty seamlessly regardless of devices specifications or licensing hiccups.
- Easily determine users connecting to specific applications to better scale growth; determining upgrade costs and licensing needs.
- Local resource redirection is easily manageable from both end user and IT management.
- Supported version and upgrades. These can become cumbersome for IT management to speck out and plan for multiple users. This delays upgrades which then prevents Citrix Support for outdated versions. (IT knows this across the board all too well)
- Configuring custom or non mainstream applications can be a strain during implementation.
Not well suited for power hungry applications, such as utilizing CPU, Memory, Bandwidth. Adobe products for example work fine however a strong user could see performance issues due to bandwidth and shared resources. This is when local installation is best.
- Allowing staff to complete time sensitive work. i.e. Accounting processing payroll, billing. Staff meeting deadlines for client production products.
- Time installing and configuring software occurrences is externally cut down. Such as personal profile configuration of toolbar's, files, shortcuts, etc.
- Software licenses reduced.
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Product Reputation
- Vendor Reputation
Citrix VDI
- Remote access. Even with high latency, HDX helps with working no not so ideal situations
- PVS server lower IOPS and faster image management
- USB redirection is a nice for remote users
- Technical support is lacking.
- Flash or HTML Videos lag with Zero clients.
- Support cost is expensive when their support is really poor.
- Saves on help desk FTEs since we only need one - since we use Zero clients which has no moving parts and goes right to storefront.
- Going from physical to VDI helps on speed of not having to re-image a system. With VDI we just have to log off and back on.
- The up front cost is expensive compared to physical, but once you start expanding VDI it's easier to roll out vs. physical. The cost will go down over time with more users.
- Remote access speed
- Secruity
- Roll out and repair
- We are using Xendesktop to roll out to a business we acquired
- We use it for external vendors
- We will use it for our DR plan
- Price
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Product Reputation
- Prior Experience with the Product
- Vendor Reputation
- Existing Relationship with the Vendor
- Third-party Reviews
- Implemented in-house
- Profile
- PVS write cache IOPS
- Self-taught
- Install is now easier
- Storefront is easier now
- remote access is easier when using Netscalers with Xendesktop
- Understanding how everything works as a whole isn't easy
- Can't just know Xendesktop also have to know how windows and GPO work
- NetScaler
- VMware
- Third party patching software
- Security devices
- Single Signon
- HTML5
- FrameHawk
- New storefront
- Faster storefront access
- Remote access without having Citrix receiver using HTML5
- Bug fixes
XenDesktop - A cut above the rest
- Ease of Management
- Scalability
- Ease of Use
- Integration with third party server and storage vendors
- Better customer service
- Ease in troubleshooting
- MIcrosoft Remote Desktop Services and Microsoft Terminal Services
- Ease of Use
- Managability
- Scalability
- Deliver access to personal desktops through storefront
- Not sure
- Price
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Prior Experience with the Product
- Vendor Reputation
- Implemented in-house
- staging
- training
- Self-taught
- deployment
- catalog and delivery group creation
- Intregration with vmware
- integratioj with netscaler
Fast response times
- netscaler
- vmware
- No
- Advanced features of XenDesktop and support for multiple OS's
- Not sure
XenDesktop for increasing productivity and simplification of infrastructure management
- XenDesktop does a very great job at load balancing our applications and desktops across servers. It uses a load evaluator index to gauge the load on the server and sends new connections to the server in the group with the lowers LEI.
- The integration into our VMware environment has been critical. Using Machine Creation Services, I am able to create an image and all machines created from that image are reset to it upon reboot. No more worrying about a user corrupting one server and having to rebuild it or deploy again from a VMware template. Creating a new server in a group is easy and fast.
- Management of user sessions within XenDesktop's Director is simple and straight forward. Finding and managing a user's session is without complication.
- The Director leaves a lot to be desired. I have had to resort to scripts and a custom page to get the information I need to properly manage our environment. The previous EdgeSight had detailed information that this just seems to leave out. There is no way to customize views, add or remove content, or otherwise customize for our brand.
- One thing left out from this version that was in previous versions, was the ability deploy applications from all servers, not just those in a delivery group. As it is set up now, you can only deploy an app to a specific set of servers in a delivery group. If I have Group A running SAP and Group B running Office, only Group B can host Office for the users, even if Group A has Office installed. It would make better use of my servers if I could have on application run from both groups and still load balance properly. It is possible to have it run from both delivery groups, but the load balancing functionality appears to not work correctly.
- A new functionality in the Feature Packs (1 and 2) was session recording. The functionality is useful, but is still clunky and uses a large amount of storage space. I have yet to see a way to auto purge old recordings without manually deleting them. Storage may be cheap now, but it still needs to be managed and used wisely. Being able to purge old recordings would go a long way.
- Our ROI has come primarily from costs of network services to our remote sites. Most have T-1 services and 10+ users. Connection to Exchange, using remote applications, and general internet usage would put these sites over the bandwidth available on those circuits. Using Citrix to host the applications and only send minimal packets to the end user, has kept us from needing to order bonded circuits.
- We are now able to provide better customer service by being able to remote control the user's session and able to go back and watch a previously recorded session to see exactly what was happening.
- Our third ROI is increased employee productivity. With applications and desktops centrally managed, we can perform updates without impacting the user experience. Updates are done on the template and then deployed to the server on its next scheduled reboot. Servers can be put into maintenance mode and not in group usage while maintenance is performed. It has increased our helpdesk productivity, by decreasing the amount of individual desktop maintenance needed.
- Usage of SAP for our remote users and centrally managing updates
- Desktops deployed for some remote locations for running multiple applications where deploying apps would be less practical.
- Microsoft Office usage across the company to standardize and simplify management of the software.
- Deploying our web based time clock in a central location.
- PowerShell scripting for the product is available. I have built scripts that look for common issues and initiates actions to resolve the issues.
- We may begin using thin clients and deploy desktops via XenDesktop solely.
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Product Reputation
- Prior Experience with the Product
- Implemented in-house
- Ensuring users had the most recent version of the Citrix Receiver and connecting to the server was the most significant issue. This took a lot of help desk man hours to complete.
- A minor issue was the configurations of the StoreFront servers with the correct secure certificates. StoreFront will not work insecure (HTTP) if you are using NetScalers (which we are.)
- The deployment of applications to the user are easy and without complication.
- The end user experience is also without issue. After launching the Citrix Receiver, the users simply need to choose their application and it launches and connects automatically.
- Initial setup of StoreFront and Netscalers take a large amount of work.
- Configuring XenDesktop with delivery groups can take some time to sort out.
- All of the policies available take a great deal of time to go through. While there are defaults, there are no starting policies which are industry standard to maximize the efficiency.