360 ECOS vs. SAP Sustainability Control Tower

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
360 ECOS
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
360 Energy offers energy efficiency solutions for businesses, as a partner for Canadian companies. ECOS is presented as an Energy and Carbon Operating System, used by businesses to manage their energy consumption and carbon emissions.N/A
SAP Sustainability Control Tower
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
SAP Sustainability Control Tower is a software solution that helps to enable users to reach sustainable business ambitions with holistic enterprise-wide sustainability performance management.N/A
Pricing
360 ECOSSAP Sustainability Control Tower
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
360 ECOSSAP Sustainability Control Tower
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
360 ECOSSAP Sustainability Control Tower
Considered Both Products
360 ECOS

No answer on this topic

SAP Sustainability Control Tower
Chose SAP Sustainability Control Tower
SAP Sustainability Control Tower provides a dashboard for monitoring production controls and sales materials. It's the only tool that works in real time with information available in the ERP system. It's also the only system with multiple EU certifications. It's also suitable …
Chose SAP Sustainability Control Tower
If SAP Sustainability Control Tower were to receive the necessary additional functionalities, it could partially cover what the three products do.
Chose SAP Sustainability Control Tower
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Chose SAP Sustainability Control Tower
We selected SCT because of our desire for SAP integration.
Chose SAP Sustainability Control Tower
Same lack of industry-specific content on both, but SAP has the main advantage of direct connection to the ERP data so it saves significant efforts in comparison. Regarding dashboards look and feel and so on, it is more a matter of personal preference between PowerBi and SAP, …
Chose SAP Sustainability Control Tower
I use both and they are complementary.
Best Alternatives
360 ECOSSAP Sustainability Control Tower
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Score 8.5 out of 10
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Score 8.5 out of 10
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
360 ECOSSAP Sustainability Control Tower
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
360 ECOSSAP Sustainability Control Tower
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
In case of a big organization that gathers data from other SAP applications on environmental aspects for instance, energy consumption, or social aspects such as HR data, SCT allows you to automatically retrieve that data and perform the calculations to then develop the company's ESG report. In case the company does not use other SAP applications it is still possible to enter the data manually in other formats but it is still possible
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • High-level summary of all required ESG metrics
  • High-level comparison between actual and planned values
  • Data can also be conveniently populated using CSV
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Implementing Custom Metrics: Support for all DPI dimensions needed
  • Drill-Down Requirements: Full dimension availability via OData API
  • Row Limit Issue: Request limit inadequate for data volume
  • Breakdown by all dimensions for metrics not feasible
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We are currently too new with The SAP sustainability Control tower ,but down the line if we see more benefits to financial sustain the product and product is actually paying off the cost from the benefits we get out of it we may renew the use of SAP sustainability control tower.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
SAP Sustainability Control Tower allows for a dashboard of production controls for sales materials. Different departments within the company can access real-time production and business information. It is suitable for various EU certifications. Also for organizations in the US and Latin America
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
not contacted support for SAP Sustainability Control Tower yet.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
No, I was not directly involved in SAP Sustainability Control Tower implementation, but before implementing feedback was taken from procurement team for several function usage.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Same lack of industry-specific content on both, but SAP has the main advantage of direct connection to the ERP data so it saves significant efforts in comparison. Regarding dashboards look and feel and so on, it is more a matter of personal preference between PowerBi and SAP, we personally prefer SAP as it is a bit richer in ability to bring in more data and filter on it.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Greater transparency around our sust strategies
  • More engaged workforce
  • Reduce OpEx by $350k in first month due to better decision in a particular area
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Sustainability Control Tower Screenshots

Screenshot of reporting scope details.Screenshot of data collection items.Screenshot of emissions data.Screenshot of a carbon footprint assessment.Screenshot of sustainability metrics.