Good but more work to be done
March 11, 2024
Good but more work to be done
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with SAP Sustainability Control Tower
We use SAP Sustainability Control Tower (SCT) to generate customer-facing dashboards that organize all underlying emissions and "sustainability-related" in an easy to understand format. While the tool works well to get core emissions data such as fleet and transportation, procurement and production emissions, it lacks data from certain industries such as energy, this is our biggest concern with SAP Sustainability Control Tower right now, the availability of industry-specific content.
- Easy to understand dashboards
- Seamless connection to underlying data
- Preconfigured content (for basic cases)
- More Industry-specific content
- No advanced scenario simulation capabilities
- Easier connection with third-party data
- Ability to better understand where emissions are coming from
- Presents the data in an easy to understand way despite the complexities of the underlying data set
Same lack of industry-specific content on both, but SAP has the main advantage of direct connection to the ERP data so it saves significant efforts in comparison. Regarding dashboards look and feel and so on, it is more a matter of personal preference between PowerBi and SAP, we personally prefer SAP as it is a bit richer in ability to bring in more data and filter on it.
Do you think SAP Sustainability Control Tower delivers good value for the price?
No
Are you happy with SAP Sustainability Control Tower's feature set?
No
Did SAP Sustainability Control Tower live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of SAP Sustainability Control Tower go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy SAP Sustainability Control Tower again?
Yes