3M M*Modal Fluency vs. Amberscript

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
3M M*Modal Fluency
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
M*Modal, a 3M company, offers the Fluency suite of speech-to-text applications designed to support the medical profession, radiologists and doctors, for note taking, entry of data into integratable EHR applications, and related functions.N/A
Amberscript
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Amberscript, headquartered in Amsterdam, helps users transform audio and video to text and subtitles through the use of its AI-driven on-demand software service.
$10
Prepaid: 1 hour of audio or video uploaded
Pricing
3M M*Modal FluencyAmberscript
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Pre-Paid
$10
per hour of audio or video uploaded
Subscription
$25
per month
Manual transcription
from $1.40
per minute
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
3M M*Modal FluencyAmberscript
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual subscription.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
3M M*Modal FluencyAmberscript
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
3M M*Modal FluencyAmberscript
Small Businesses
Dragon Speech Recognition
Dragon Speech Recognition
Score 8.8 out of 10
Dragon Speech Recognition
Dragon Speech Recognition
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Verint Speech Analytics
Verint Speech Analytics
Score 8.9 out of 10
Verint Speech Analytics
Verint Speech Analytics
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
3M M*Modal FluencyAmberscript
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
3M M*Modal FluencyAmberscript
Likelihood to Recommend
3M
No answers on this topic
Amberscript
Amberscript is great for transcribing individual audio (or video) files that reside on your computer. The ability to view and edit the text of the text file (to correct or remove data that you don't want to be shared) before the output is a great option. I feel it may be limited in the ability to transcribe live audio records such as phone calls or meetings, where we would find it very useful to have immediate access to a transcript (for coaching or sharing purposes). I feel the needs are more designed as a solution for pre-existing audio/video files versus working in real-time.
Read full review
Pros
3M
No answers on this topic
Amberscript
  • Automated Speech to text transcribing
  • Video and Audio file to text data file conversion
Read full review
Cons
3M
No answers on this topic
Amberscript
  • There does not appear to be a way to transcribe live audio (such as a live meeting or live phone call)
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
3M
No answers on this topic
Amberscript
I feel that Amazon Transcribe was much more feature-rich, allowing for a much more real-time solution, whereas Amberscript is great for transcribing existing call recordings (or video files) to a rich text file. Amazon Transcribe will do both, while Amberscript only does the latter. For our business, this was a significant feature loss for Amberscript.
Read full review
Return on Investment
3M
No answers on this topic
Amberscript
  • Having an automated speech-to-text conversion allows us to reduce human hours, which would normally take notes or have to review long audio files.
  • Being able to transcribe multiple call recordings into a searchable text format allows for coaching of issues in a much more efficient format than an audio recording.
Read full review
ScreenShots