3Q Video vs. EditShare

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
3Q Video
Score 0.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
3Q Video is a European enterprise video platform operated by 3Q GmbH in Munich. It is built for organisations that need to control where their video data is stored and processed: media companies and broadcasters, corporate communications teams, education and public-sector bodies, and event and OTT providers in compliance-driven markets. European data sovereignty Unlike vendors that rent capacity from US hyperscalers, 3Q owns its full video…N/A
EditShare
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
EditShare offers networked shared storage and workflow solutions for the production, post-production, new media, sports, and education markets, including on-prem, cloud, or hybrid solutions. Products include media optimized high-performance shared storage, archiving and backup software, a suite of media management tools and open APIs that enable integration throughout the workflow.N/A
Pricing
3Q VideoEditShare
Editions & Modules
Pay as you Go
Pay per Use
Usage Based
Enterprise
Price on request
per month Usage Based
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
3Q VideoEditShare
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details3Q is priced in euros on a modular, pay-as-you-go basis with no base fee: customers pay for the capacity they use and add modules as needed. A 7-day free trial is available with access to all core modules. Enterprise is quoted on request, with tailored packages and terms, volume pricing, and enterprise features such as SSO/SAML, premium network and eCDN, SLA-backed support, and professional services. For larger or more complex projects, Enterprise Fast Track is a direct line to 3Q's business team. Current pricing is published at 3q.video/en/pricing/packages.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
3Q VideoEditShare
Considered Both Products
3Q Video

No answer on this topic

EditShare
Chose EditShare
Again, the analytics of these other systems were vague, but more urgently, the organization of the content was awkward. In some situations such as Get-A-Reel, I cannot save links to use as templates, thus I have to rebuild each reel from the beginning.
Chose EditShare
EASE OF USE. There are so many options and offerings in all of these tools, but the UI/UX design and intuitiveness for accomplishing tasks is far superior than the other tools I've tested and utilized.
Chose EditShare
We switched over from WorkZone to Wiredrive. We loved WorkZone's ability to keep certain files hidden from our clients but overall we feel that Wiredrive is a better fit for our marketing needs.
Best Alternatives
3Q VideoEditShare
Small Businesses
Wistia
Wistia
Score 9.6 out of 10
Wistia
Wistia
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Flipgrid
Flipgrid
Score 1.0 out of 10
Flipgrid
Flipgrid
Score 1.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Panopto
Panopto
Score 7.5 out of 10
Panopto
Panopto
Score 7.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
3Q VideoEditShare
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
3Q VideoEditShare
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
The companies with whom I work that do not use Wiredrive use Simian, Get-A-Reel and in one case, a proprietary platform designed in house. These systems are not as fast, the content not as well organized and the analytics not revealing. These are the issues I bring up with these companies and the questions I would pose to a prospective user
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • An easy to use and in-depth online library for our work. Fully customizable, we can add tags/credits to each piece of work for further organization and sorting.
  • The project side of Wiredrive is perfect for our clients needs. We are able to upload all required work to one place and send out customizable presentations to each client with their own logo.
  • Interfacing with new or prospective clients is easy with the customizable presentations.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Bulk delete is certainly something to be looked at. This could be made easier.
  • Thumbnail customisation on project folders.
  • Thumbnail customisation for videos stored.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
I feel we are only scratching the surface of the current offerings, so further investigation is needed. Also, future developments and current impressive client base are additional selling points.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
We selected Wiredrive because of the fantastic customer service.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • All positive. Users and clients love it!
Read full review
ScreenShots

3Q Video Screenshots

Screenshot of The Cookie- and Consent-free HTML5 video player, brand-customisable and accessible to WCAG 2.1 and BITV 2.0 standards.Screenshot of The live streaming interface for setting up and broadcasting streams to audiences of any size, with automatic Live2VOD recording.Screenshot of The central media library for hosting, organising, and searching video and audio content in one place.Screenshot of Video management: uploading and organising assets, with automatic subtitles, transcriptions, and metadata generated by video AI.Screenshot of The 3Q platform shown across desktop and mobile, managing video hosting, streaming, and analytics from one interface.Screenshot of A video management overview listing all video assets with their status and performance at a glance.